Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139393›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a standardized training model for improving patients' ability to use inhalers.

Yuwen Huang, Fangzhou Miao, Yunjian Dai, Cuie Chang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Haibin Dai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Video directly observed therapy to improve inhaler technique among pediatric patients with persistent asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2025
    Trial
  2. Behavioral Phenotypes of Inhaler Technique and Adherence in COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuwen Huang *Department of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fangzhou Miao *Department of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yunjian DaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Cuie ChangDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoyu ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Haibin DaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Training contributes to the effectiveness of aerosol inhalation therapy. However, qualitative and quantitative evaluation of effective training methods is rarely reported. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized training model by pharmacists based on verbal instruction and physical demonstration in improving patients' ability to use inhalers using qualitative and quantitative methods. Risk or protective factors affecting correct inhaler use were also explored. Methods: 431 Outpatients with asthma or COPD were recruited and randomly divided into a standardized training group ( Results: The multi-criteria analysis showed that the standardized training model had comprehensive advantages in qualitative indicators. The average correct use percentage (CU%) of the standardized training group was significantly higher than that of the usual training group (77.6% vs. 35.5%). A stratified analysis further demonstrated that the ORs (95%CI) in the usual training group of age and educational level was 2.263 (1.165-4.398) and 0.556 (0.379-0.815), while in the standardized training group, age and educational level were not the key factors influencing the ability to use inhaler devices ( Conclusion: These findings indicate that the framework of qualitative and quantitative comparisons could be used to evaluate training models, and the standardized training model by pharmacists can significantly improve patients' ability to use inhalers correctly and address the influence of older age and lower education because of its methodological advantages. Further studies with more extended follow-up are needed to validate the role of the standardized training model by pharmacists in the correct use of inhalers. Clinical trial registration: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100043592 (23-02-2021).

Indexed as

AsthmaHumansNebulizers and VaporizersOutpatientsRespiratory Aerosols and Dropletsasthmainhalation techniqueinhalerqualitative evaluationquantitative evaluationtraining

Identifiers

PMID37139393
PMCPMC10149962
OpenAlexW4366215302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.