Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139260›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

DECLARE: A Comprehensive, Multifaceted Cognitive Forcing Strategy to Confront Complex Cases.

Taro Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-487X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic excellence is an important goal in medicine. The enhancement of clinical reasoning skills of physicians, which is at the core of this concept, is a significant challenge. To achieve this improvement, it is necessary to enhance the ability to collect patient history information and to integrate the information. Additionally, the complexity of diagnosis is confounded by biases, noise, uncertainty, and contextual factors, and the impact of these factors is particularly prominent in complex cases. In such cases, the dual process theory, which is a classical reasoning measure, alone is insufficient to cope with these challenges, and a multifaceted and comprehensive approach is required to supplement its limitations. Therefore, the author presents six concrete steps, represented by the acronym DECLARE (Decomposition, Extraction, Causation Link, Assessing Accountability, Recomposition, Explanation and Exploration), that implement the concept of cognitive forcing strategy that has been shown to be effective in bias control, and include reflection, meta-cognition, and the recently popularized decision hygiene procedure. DECLARE is a strategy that should be deployed when faced with more complex diagnostic scenarios. By examining each of the six steps that comprise DECLARE individually, cognitive load can be reduced. Furthermore, by verifying causation and accountability when constructing diagnostic hypotheses, biases can be mitigated, which can also help to address noise and uncertainty, leading to an improvement in the quality of diagnosis and effectiveness in medical education.

Indexed as

causal inferencedecision hygienediagnostic excellencediagnostic strategymeta-cognitionreflection

Identifiers

PMID37139260
PMCPMC10149772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.