Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

Dermatology and Venereology Consultation Pattern from Inpatient and Emergency Department in Tertiary Hospital Setting Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Shannaz Nadia Yusharyahya, Valdi Ven Japranata, Ratih Wulan Kusumahapsari, Lili Legiawati, Rinadewi Astriningrum, Karin Rachmani, Chia-Yu Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shannaz Nadia YusharyahyaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4786-3375
Valdi Ven JapranataFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8215-9418
Ratih Wulan KusumahapsariFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-9689-2458
Lili LegiawatiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-2525
Rinadewi AstriningrumDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0236-2318
Karin RachmaniDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4928-8274
Chia-Yu ChuDepartment of Dermatology, National Taiwan University and Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9370-3279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Purpose: COVID-19 pandemic has compromised healthcare services in dermatology and venereology. Given such circumstances, studies investigating the consultation pattern of related fields in hospitals were relatively scarce. The present study aimed to delineate such matter from tertiary hospital viewpoint. Methods: Details concerning referred patients from the emergency room, inpatient wards, intensive care unit, and nursery to the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital were retrospectively collected from electronic health records. Cases admitted in the 17 months span before and during COVID-19 global outbreak were included. The obtained data were presented descriptively, and Chi-squared test was performed upon attributes of interest at a significance level of 0.05. Results: A slight increase of total consultation was found in the COVID-19 era with an initial reduction at the beginning (April-May 2020). One-time consultation was the most inquired to our department in both periods of which dermatitis was the most prevalent case and Gram staining was the most common examination. Topical antibiotics and emollient were the most prescribed medications before and during the outbreak, respectively. The conformity of initial-final decision, appropriateness of initial-final diagnosis, and consult response time were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusion: There were changes of the number of consultation requests in the pandemic era with statistically significant change of decision conformity, diagnoses, appropriateness, and consult response time. Although some changes appeared, the most prevalent diagnoses remained.

Indexed as

consultation patternCOVID-19dermatologyvenereology

Identifiers

PMID37139259
PMCPMC10150734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.