Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Real-world clinical outcomes of nivolumab and taxane as a second- or later-line therapy for recurrent or unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Manato Ohsawa, Yoichi Hamai, Manabu Emi, Yuta Ibuki, Tomoaki Kurokawa, Toru Yoshikawa, Ryosuke Hirohata, Nao Kitasaki, Morihito Okada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manato OhsawaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoichi HamaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Manabu EmiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuta IbukiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tomoaki KurokawaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toru YoshikawaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ryosuke HirohataDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nao KitasakiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Morihito OkadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nivolumab is approved in Japan as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) resistant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs. It is also used in adjuvant and primary postoperative therapies. This study aimed to report real-world data on nivolumab use for esophageal cancer treatment. Methods: In total, 171 patients with recurrent or unresectable advanced ESCC who received nivolumab (n = 61) or taxane (n = 110) were included. We collected real-world data of patients treated with nivolumab as a second- or later-line therapy and evaluated treatment outcomes and safety. Results: Median overall survival was longer and progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer (p = 0.0172) in patients who received nivolumab than in patients who received taxane as a second- or later-line therapy. Furthermore, subgroup analysis for second-line treatment only showed the superiority of nivolumab in increasing the PFS rate (p = 0.0056). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: In real-world practice, nivolumab was safer and more effective than taxane in patients with ESCC with diverse clinical profiles who did not meet trial eligibility criteria, including those with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, comorbidities, and receiving multiple treatments.

Indexed as

chemotherapyesophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapynivolumabtaxane

Identifiers

PMID37139161
PMCPMC10151017
OpenAlexW4366206100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.