Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139130›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Removal of inferior vena cava filter by open surgery after failure of endovenous retrieval.

Xuan Tian, Jianlong Liu, Jinyong Li, Wei Jia, Peng Jiang, Zhiyuan Cheng, Yunxin Zhang, Xiao Liu, M I Zhou, Chenyang Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xuan TianDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianlong LiuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jinyong LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei JiaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peng JiangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiyuan ChengDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunxin ZhangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao LiuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
M I ZhouDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenyang TianDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The permanent placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters may lead to numerous complications and their removal is recommended once the risk of pulmonary embolism is reduced. Removal of IVC filters by endovenous means is preferred. But failure of endovenous removal happens when recycling hooks penetrate the vein wall and filters are left in place for too long time. In these scenarios, open surgery may be effective for removal of IVC filters. We aimed to describe the surgical approach, outcomes, and 6-month follow-up of the removal of IVC filter by open surgery, after the failure of removal Methods: A total of 1,285 patients with retrievable IVC filters were admitted from July 2019 to June 2021, including 1,176 (91.5%) endovenous filter removals, and 24 (1.9%) open surgical IVC filter removals after the failure by endovenous method, of whom 21 (1.6%) were followed-up and eligible for analysis of the study. Patient characteristics, filter type, filter removal rate, IVC patency rate, and complications were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Twenty-one patients were left with IVC filters for 26 (10, 37) months, of which 17 (81.0%) patients had non-conical filters and 4 (19.0%) had conical filters; all 21 filters were successfully removed, with a 100% removal rate, no deaths, no serious complications, and no symptomatic pulmonary embolism. At the 3rd month follow-up after surgery and 3rd month follow-up after discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy, only 1 case (4.8%) had IVC occlusion, but without any occurrence of new lower limb deep venous thrombosis and silent pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: Open surgery can be used for the removal of IVC filters after failure of removal by endovenous method or when accompanied by complications without symptoms of pulmonary embolism. Open surgical approach can be used as an adjunctive clinical intervention for the removal of such filters.

Indexed as

complicationopen surgical filter removalpulmonary embolismthrombosisvena cava filter

Identifiers

PMID37139130
PMCPMC10150111
OpenAlexW4366213431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.