ArticleEcancermedicalscience2023
Evaluation of side effects and compliance to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients at a Nigerian tertiary hospital.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Quality of Life and Incidence of Chemotherapy Side Effects in Women With Breast Cancer.Integrative cancer therapiesTrial
- Advances in intratumoral immunotherapy from a neuro-immune-endocrine perspective for breast cancer treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Exploring Challenges Related to Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Among Females in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- The feasibility and safety of fasting-mimicking diet in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy in China.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic factors and treatment effects on quality of life in locally advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- Access to and Utilization of Endocrine Therapy Among Breast Cancer Survivors in Botswana.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy improves tumour control and survival, but it may be associated with side effects (SEs) which can impair treatment compliance and worsen outcomes. Assessment of patients in routine clinical practice, outside clinical trials, may provide the information on effects of chemotherapy on patients and its impacts on treatment compliance. Aim: To assess the SE and compliance to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methodology: A prospective study involving 120 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was carried out at the oncology clinics of the University College Hospital Ibadan. SEs reported were recorded and graded using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. Compliance was defined as a receipt of planned cycles of chemotherapy in the planned doses within the planned duration. The data collected were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 25. Results: The patients were all females with a mean age of 51.2 ± 11.8 years. Patients reported between 2 and 13 SE with a median of 8 SE. Forty-two (35.0%) missed at least one course of chemotherapy while 78 (65%) were compliant. The reasons for non-compliance were deranged blood test 17 (14.2%), chemotherapy SE symptoms related 11 (9.1%), financial constraints 10 (8.3%), disease progression 2 (1.7%) and transportation-related 2 (1.7%). Conclusion: Breast cancer patients encounter multiple SEs from chemotherapy which led to non-compliance with the treatment. Early identification and prompt treatment of these SEs will improve compliance with chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.