Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138939›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2023

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the characterization of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.

Katarzyna M Pawlak, Nadeem Tehami, Ben Maher, Shujaath Asif, Krishn Kant Rawal, Daniel Vasile Balaban, Mohammed Tag-Adeen, Fahd Ghalim, Wael A Abbas, Elsayed Ghoneem and 11 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ovarian cancer mimicking pancreatic cancer.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Katarzyna M PawlakEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital of The Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin 01-218, Poland.
Nadeem TehamiInterventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, 3AX PO, United Kingdom.
Ben MaherInterventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, 3AX PO, United Kingdom.
Shujaath AsifConsultant Gastroenterologist, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad 500032, India.
Krishn Kant RawalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Prime Institute of Digestive Sciences, Rajkot 360001, India.
Daniel Vasile BalabanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 010011, Romania.
Mohammed Tag-AdeenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena 83511, Egypt.
Fahd GhalimInterventional Endoscopy Unit, Sainte Marie Hospital, OSNY 95520, France.
Wael A AbbasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit 71511, Egypt.
Elsayed GhoneemDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35511, Egypt.
Khaled RagabDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza 12511, Egypt.
Mahmoud El-AnsaryDepartment of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza 12511, Egypt.
Shanil KadirDepartment of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi 75900, Pakistan.
Sunil AminDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 32118, United States.
Keith SiauDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Anna Wiechowska-KozlowskaEndoscopy Unit, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin 71-146, Poland.
Klaus MönkemüllerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, AL 35294, United States.
Dalia AbdelfatahDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11511, Egypt.
Abeer AbdellatefDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kasr Al-Aini School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11511, Egypt.
Sundeep LakhtakiaConsultant Gastroenterologist, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad 500032, India.
Hussein Hassan OkashaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kasr Al-Aini School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11451, Egypt. hussein_okasha@kasralainy.edu.eg.
Cairo University · EGMinistry of Interior and Administration · PLTheodor Bilharz Research Institute · EGUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBAssiut University · EGCarilion Clinic · USCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROChildren Cancer Hospital · EGGroupement d'Intérêt Economique · FRLiaquat National Hospital · PKMansoura University · EGRoyal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBSouth Valley University · EGUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is an uncommon pathology of the pancreas with unpredictable malignant potential. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) assessment plays a vital role in lesion characterization and confirmation of the tissue diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the imaging assessment of these lesions.

aimTo determine the characteristic EUS features of SPN and define its role in preoperative assessment.

methodsThis was an international, multicenter, retrospective, observational study of prospective cohorts from 7 large hepatopancreaticobiliary centers. All cases with postoperative histology of SPN were included in the study. Data collected included clinical, biochemical, histological and EUS characteristics.

resultsOne hundred and six patients with the diagnosis of SPN were included. The mean age was 26 years (range 9 to 70 years), with female predominance (89.6%). The most frequent clinical presentation was abdominal pain (80/106; 75.5%). The mean diameter of the lesion was 53.7 mm (range 15 to 130 mm), with the slight predominant location in the head of the pancreas (44/106; 41.5%). The majority of lesions presented with solid imaging features (59/106; 55.7%) although 33.0% (35/106) had mixed solid/cystic characteristics and 11.3% (12/106) had cystic morphology. Calcification was observed in only 4 (3.8%) cases. Main pancreatic duct dilation was uncommon, evident in only 2 cases (1.9%), whilst common bile duct dilation was observed in 5 (11.3%) cases. One patient demonstrated a double duct sign at presentation. Elastography and Doppler evaluation demonstrated inconsistent appearances with no emergence of a predictable pattern. EUS guided biopsy was performed using three different types of needles: Fine needle aspiration (67/106; 63.2%), fine needle biopsy (37/106; 34.9%), and Sonar Trucut (2/106; 1.9%). The diagnosis was conclusive in 103 (97.2%) cases. Ninety-seven patients were treated surgically (91.5%) and the post-surgical SPN diagnosis was confirmed in all cases. During the 2-year follow-up period, no recurrence was observed.

conclusionSPN presented primarily as a solid lesion on endosonographic assessment. The lesion tended to be located in the head or body of the pancreas. There was no consistent characteristic pattern apparent on either elastography or Doppler assessment. Similarly SPN did not frequently cause stricture of the pancreatic duct or common bile duct. Importantly, we confirmed that EUS-guided biopsy was an efficient and safe diagnostic tool. The needle type used does not appear to have a significant impact on the diagnostic yield. Overall SPN remains a challenging diagnosis based on EUS imaging with no pathognomonic features. EUS guided biopsy remains the gold standard in establishing the diagnosis.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasound featuresEUS-guided biopsyFine needle aspiration/biopsyFrantz tumorSolid pseudopapillary neoplasmSPN

Identifiers

PMID37138939
PMCPMC10150282
OpenAlexW4365456948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.