Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138932›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2023

Endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: Is cold snaring the promised land?

Ludovico Alfarone, Marco Spadaccini, Gianluca Franchellucci, Kareem Khalaf, Davide Massimi, Alessandro De Marco, Silvia Ferretti, Valeria Poletti, Antonio Facciorusso, Roberta Maselli and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Updates on the Management of Ampullary Neoplastic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludovico AlfaroneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Marco SpadacciniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Gianluca FranchellucciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Kareem KhalafDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto M5B 1W8, Canada.
Davide MassimiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Alessandro De MarcoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy . marco.spadaccini@humanitas.it.
Silvia FerrettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Valeria PolettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Antonio FacciorussoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71100, Italy.
Roberta MaselliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Alessandro FugazzaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy.
Matteo ColomboDepartment of Gastroenterology, Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy.
Antonio CapogrecoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy.
Silvia CarraraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy.
Cesare HassanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Alessandro RepiciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract, endoscopic resection (ER) has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas. However, due to the anatomical characteristics of this area, which enhance the risk of post-ER problems, ER in the duodenum is particularly difficult. Due to a lack of data, no ER technique for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours (SNADETs) has yet been backed by strong, high-quality evidence; yet, traditional hot snare-based techniques are still regarded as the standard treatment. Despite having a favourable efficiency profile, adverse events during duodenal hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and hot endoscopic mucosal resection, such as delayed bleeding and perforation, have been reported to be frequent. These events are primarily caused by electrocautery-induced damage. Thus, ER techniques with a better safety profile are needed to overcome these shortcomings. Cold snare polypectomy, which has already been shown as a safer, equally effective procedure compared to HSP for treatment of small colorectal polyps, is being increasingly evaluated as a potential therapeutic option for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas. The aim of this review is to report and discuss the early outcomes of the first experiences with cold snaring for SNADETs.

Indexed as

Cold snare polypectomyEfficacyEndoscopic resectionHot snare polypectomyNon-ampullary duodenal adenomasSafety

Identifiers

PMID37138932
PMCPMC10150288
OpenAlexW4365457068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.