Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138785›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2023

Data-Resource Profile: United Kingdom Optimum Patient Care Research Database.

Anita Lynam, Charlotte Curtis, Brooklyn Stanley, Heath Heatley, Chloe Worthington, Emma-Jane Roberts, Christopher Price, Victoria Carter, John Dennis, Andrew McGovern and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Big Data Research on Severe Asthma.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anita LynamMomentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7732-0211
Charlotte CurtisMomentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-3887
Brooklyn StanleyOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7855-129X
Heath HeatleyObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore.
Chloe WorthingtonOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6424-1319
Emma-Jane RobertsOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.
Christopher PriceOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.
Victoria CarterOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.
John DennisMomentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK.
Andrew McGovernMomentum Data, Pendragon House, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK.
David PriceOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-9992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic medical records (EMRs) maintained in primary care in the UK and collected and stored in EMR databases offer a world-leading resource for observational clinical research. We aimed to profile one such database: the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). Methods and Participants: The OPCRD, incepted in 2010, is a growing primary care EMR database collecting data from 992 general practices within the UK. It covers over 16.6 million patients across all four countries within the UK, and is broadly representative of the UK population in terms of age, sex, ethnicity and socio-economic status. Patients have a mean duration of 11.7 years' follow-up (SD 17.50), with a majority having key summary data from birth to last data entry. Data for the OPCRD are collected incrementally monthly and extracted from all of the major clinical software systems used within the UK and across all four coding systems (Read version 2, Read CTV3, SNOMED DM+D and SNOMED CT codes). Via quality-improvement programmes provided to GP surgeries, the OPCRD also includes patient-reported outcomes from a range of disease-specific validated questionnaires, with over 66,000 patient responses on asthma, COPD, and COVID-19. Further, bespoke data collection is possible by working with GPs to collect new research via patient-reported questionnaires. Findings to Date: The OPCRD has contributed to over 96 peer-reviewed research publications since its inception encompassing a broad range of medical conditions, including COVID-19. Conclusion: The OPCRD represents a unique resource with great potential to support epidemiological research, from retrospective observational studies through to embedded cluster-randomised trials. Advantages of the OPCRD over other EMR databases are its large size, UK-wide geographical coverage, the availability of up-to-date patient data from all major GP software systems, and the unique collection of patient-reported information on respiratory health.

Indexed as

datasetsdemographyelectronic health recordshealth outcomesmedical recordsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID37138785
PMCPMC10150735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.