Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138783›Full record

Review3 Biotech2023

Flowering in sugarcane-insights from the grasses.

Gongati Pavani, Pawan Kumar Malhotra, Sandeep Kumar Verma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gongati PavaniSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004 India.
Pawan Kumar MalhotraSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004 India.
Sandeep Kumar VermaInstitute of Biological Science, SAGE University, Bypass Road, Kailod Kartal, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452020 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-747X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowering is a crucial phase for angiosperms to continue their species propagation and is highly regulated. In the current review, flowering in sugarcane and the associated mechanisms are elaborately presented. In sugarcane, flowering has two effects, wherein it is a beneficial factor from the breeder's perspective and crucial for crop improvement, but commercially, it depletes the sucrose reserves from the stalks; hence, less value is assigned. Different species of

Indexed as

BiochemicalCircadianFloweringmiRNAsMolecularSugarcane

Identifiers

PMID37138783
PMCPMC10149435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.