ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2023
The detection and prediction of surgical site infections using multi-modal sensors and machine learning: Results in an animal model.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stimuli-Responsive Nanomaterial-Based Biosensor Structures for Wound Care: pH, ROS, and Temperature Sensing Strategies.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for patient safety in complex surgery: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Review
- Monitoring Surgical Site Infections: Insights from an Italian Teaching Hospital.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Review
- A Scoping Review of 'Smart' Dressings for Diagnosing Surgical Site Infection: A Focus on Arthroplasty.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Preclinical In-Vivo Safety and Toxicokinetics of D-PLEX100 in an Abdominal Surgery Incision Model in Juvenile Miniature Swine.International journal of toxicologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is a common healthcare-associated infection that imposes a considerable clinical and economic burden on healthcare systems. Advances in wearable sensors and digital technologies have unlocked the potential for the early detection and diagnosis of SSI, which can help reduce this healthcare burden and lower SSI-associated mortality rates. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the ability of a multi-modal bio-signal system to predict current and developing superficial incisional infection in a porcine model infected with Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) using a bagged, stacked, and balanced ensemble logistic regression machine learning model. Results: Results demonstrated that the expression levels of individual biomarkers (i.e., peri-wound tissue oxygen saturation, temperature, and bioimpedance) differed between non-infected and infected wounds across the study period, with cross-correlation analysis indicating that a change in bio-signal expression occurred 24 to 31 hours before this change was reflected by clinical wound scoring methods employed by trained veterinarians. Moreover, the multi-modal ensemble model indicated acceptable discriminability to detect the presence of a current superficial incisional SSI (AUC = 0.77), to predict an SSI 24 hours in advance of veterinarian-based SSI diagnosis (AUC = 0.80), and to predict an SSI 48 hours in advance of veterinarian-based SSI diagnosis (AUC = 0.74). Discussion: In sum, the results of the current study indicate that non-invasive multi-modal sensor and signal analysis systems have the potential to detect and predict superficial incisional SSIs in porcine subjects under experimental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.