Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138568›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023

Impact of parental and healthcare professional concern on the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Zoe Sever, Luregn J Schlapbach, Patricia Gilholm, Melanie Jessup, Natalie Phillips, Shane George, Kristen Gibbons, Amanda Harley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Physicians' appraisal of parental concerns: a qualitative assessment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zoe SeverSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Luregn J SchlapbachChild Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Patricia GilholmChild Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Melanie JessupSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Natalie PhillipsChild Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shane GeorgeChild Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kristen GibbonsChild Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Amanda HarleySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUQueensland Children’s Hospital · AUChildren’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends systematic screening for sepsis. Although many sepsis screening tools include parent or healthcare professional concern, there remains a lack of evidence to support this practice. We aimed to test the diagnostic accuracy of parent and healthcare professional concern in relation to illness severity, to diagnose sepsis in children. Design: This prospective multicenter study measured the level of concern for illness severity as perceived by the parent, treating nurse and doctor using a cross-sectional survey. The primary outcome was sepsis, defined as a pSOFA score >0. The unadjusted area under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) were calculated. Setting: Two specialised pediatric Emergency Departments in Queensland. Patients: Children aged 30 days to 18 years old that were evaluated for sepsis. Intervention: None. Main Results: 492 children were included in the study, of which 118 (23.9%) had sepsis. Parent concern was not associated with sepsis (AUC 0.53, 95% CI: 0.46-0.61, aOR: 1.18; 0.89-1.58) but was for PICU admission (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.17-3.19) and bacterial infection (aOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.14-1.92). Healthcare professional concern was associated with sepsis in both unadjusted and adjusted models (nurses: AUC 0.57, 95% CI-0.50, 0.63, aOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.63; doctors: AUC 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.70, aOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.14-2.19). Conclusions: While our study does not support the broad use of parent or healthcare professional concern in isolation as a pediatric sepsis screening tool, measures of concern may be valuable as an adjunct in combination with other clinical data to support sepsis recognition. Clinical Trial Registration: ACTRN12620001340921.

Indexed as

concerndiagnosisdoctornurseparentsepsis

Identifiers

PMID37138568
PMCPMC10149924
OpenAlexW4366227064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.