Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138559›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2023

Research and Innovation in Organ Donation: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.

Manuel Escoto, Fadi Issa, Florence Cayouette, Henrietta Consolo, Prosanto Chaudhury, Sonny Dhanani, Wenshi Jiang, Gabriel C Oniscu, Nicholas Murphy, Karen Rockell and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The INTEGRITY guidelines - ethical guidance for research involving deceased donation and transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel EscotoCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Fadi IssaNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, United Kingdom.
Florence CayouettePediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Henrietta ConsoloSchool of Law, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Prosanto ChaudhuryTransplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sonny DhananiCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Wenshi JiangShanxi Provincial Organ Procurement and Allocation Center, People's Republic of China.
Gabriel C OniscuEdinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nicholas MurphyDepartments of Medicine and Philosophy, Western University, Canada.
Karen RockellLiver Transplant Recipient/Co-Director and PPIE Lead, United Kingdom Organ Donation and Transplantation Research Network, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Matthew J WeissCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mélanie DieudéCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Translational Research in Oncology · CAGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N027930/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report provides recommendations from the Research and Innovation domain as part of the International Donation and Transplantation Legislative and Policy Forum (hereafter the Forum) to provide expert guidance on the structure of an ideal organ and tissue donation and transplantation system. The recommendations focus on deceased donation research and are intended for clinicians, investigators, decision-makers, and patient, family, and donor (PFD) partners involved in the field. Methods: We identified topics impacting donation research through consensus using nominal group technique. Members performed narrative reviews and synthesized current knowledge on each topic, which included academic articles, policy documents, and gray literature. Using the nominal group technique, committee members discussed significant findings, which provided evidence for our recommendations. The Forum's scientific committee then vetted recommendations. Results: We developed 16 recommendations in 3 key areas to provide stakeholders guidance in developing a robust deceased donor research framework. These include PFD and public involvement in research; donor, surrogate, and recipient consent within a research ethics framework; and data management. We highlight the importance of PFD and public partner involvement in research, we define the minimum ethical requirements for the protection of donors and recipients of both target and nontarget organ recipients, and we recommend the creation of a centrally administered donor research oversight committee, a single specialist institutional review board, and a research oversight body to facilitate coordination and ethical oversight of organ donor intervention research. Conclusions: Our recommendations provide a roadmap for developing and implementing an ethical deceased donation research framework that continually builds public trust. Although these recommendations can be applied to jurisdictions developing or reforming their organ and tissue donation and transplantation system, stakeholders are encouraged to collaborate and respond to their specific jurisdictional needs related to organ and tissue shortages.

Identifiers

PMID37138559
PMCPMC10150888
OpenAlexW4367307049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.