ArticleTransplantation direct2023
International Donation and Transplantation Legislative and Policy Forum: Methods and Purpose.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public awareness and acceptance of xenotransplantation in China: a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Transformative learning through the "Honor Walk" in nursing education: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- A narrative review on the psychosocial domains of the impact of organ transplantation.Discover mental health · 2025Review
- Development of the Nova Scotia Potential Donor Audit (PDA) Tool and 2020 Historic Performance Database: Lessons Learned From the First 1000 Medical Record Reviews.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Research and Innovation in Organ Donation: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Organ and Tissue Donation Consent Model and Intent to Donate Registries: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Legislation and Policy Recommendations on Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation From an International Consensus Forum.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Baseline Ethical Principles and a Framework for Evaluation of Policies: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Tissue and Cell Donation: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Organ Donation Organization Architecture: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) legislation and policies vary around the world, and this variability contributes to discrepancies in system performance. This article describes the purpose and methodology of an international forum that was organized to create consensus recommendations related to key legal and policy attributes of an ideal OTDT system. The intent is to create guidance for legislators, regulators, and other system stakeholders who aim to create or reform OTDT legislation and policy. Methods: This Forum was initiated by Transplant Québec and cohosted by the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Program partnered with multiple national and international donation and transplantation organizations. Seven domains were identified by the scientific committee' and domain working groups identified specific topics for recommendations: Baseline Ethical Principles, Legal Foundations, Consent Model and Emerging Legal Issues, Donation System Architecture, Living Donation, Tissue Donation, and Research and Innovation Systems and Emerging Issues. Patient, family, and donor partners were integrated into every stage of the planning and execution of the Forum. Sixty-one participants from 13 countries contributed to recommendation generation. Topic identification and recommendation consensus was completed over a series of virtual meetings from March to September 2021. Consensus was achieved by applying the nominal group technique informed by literature reviews performed by participants. Recommendations were presented at a hybrid in-person and virtual forum in Montreal, Canada, in October 2021. Output: Ninety-four recommendations (9-33 per domain) and an ethical framework for evaluating new policies were developed during the Forum proceedings. The accompanying articles include the recommendations from each domain and justifications that link the consensus to existing literature and ethical or legal concepts. Conclusions: Although the recommendations could not account for the vast global diversity of populations, healthcare infrastructure, and resources available to OTDT systems, they were written to be as widely applicable as possible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.