Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138295›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2023

Learning collaboration at the primary-secondary care interface: a dual-method study to define design principles for interventions in postgraduate training programmes.

Marijn Janssen, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Roel R Lubbers, Sylvia A Cornelissen, Jacqueline de Graaf, Nynke D Scherpbier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marijn JanssenDepartment of Internal Medicine Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, PO box 9101, postal route 463, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands. Marijn.Janssen@radboudumc.nl.
Cornelia R M G FluitRadboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roel R LubbersDepartment of Internal Medicine Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, PO box 9101, postal route 463, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Sylvia A CornelissenDepartment of Internal Medicine Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, PO box 9101, postal route 463, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline de GraafRadboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nynke D ScherpbierDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaboration between primary and secondary care (PSCC) is important to provide patient-centered care. Postgraduate training programmes should provide training to learn PSCC. With a design based research (DBR) approach design principles can be formulated for designing effective interventions in specific contexts. The aim of this study is to determine design principles for interventions aimed to learn PSCC in postgraduate training programmes.

methodsDBR is characterised by multi-method studies. We started with a literature review on learning collaboration between healthcare professionals from different disciplines within the same profession (intraprofessional) to extract preliminary design principles. These were used to inform and feed group discussions among stakeholders: trainees, supervisors and educationalists in primary and secondary care. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to formulate design principles.

resultsEight articles were included in the review. We identified four preliminary principles to consider in the design of interventions: participatory design, work process involvement, personalised education and role models. We conducted three group discussions with in total eighteen participants. We formulated three design principles specific for learning PSCC in postgraduate training programmes: (1) The importance of interaction, being able to engage in a learning dialogue. (2) Facilitate that the learning dialogue concerns collaboration. (3) Create a workplace that facilitates engagement in a learning dialogue. In the last design principle we distinguished five subcategories: intervention emphasises the urge for PSCC and is based on daily practice, the presence of role models, the work context creates time for learning PSCC, learning PSCC is formalised in curricula and the presence of a safe learning environment.

conclusionThis article describes design principles for interventions in postgraduate training programmes with the aim to learn PSCC. Interaction is key in learning PSCC. This interaction should concern collaborative issues. Furthermore, it is essential to include the workplace in the intervention and make adjacent changes in the workplace when implementing interventions. The knowledge gathered in this study can be used to design interventions for learning PSCC. Evaluation of these interventions is needed to acquire more knowledge and adjust design principles when necessary.

Indexed as

LearningSecondary Health CareCurriculumHealth PersonnelHumansMedical education designPostgraduate training programmesPrimary-secondary care collaboration

Identifiers

PMID37138295
PMCPMC10158135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.