Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138282›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2023

Uncertainty and probability in neonatal end-of-life decision-making: analysing real-time conversations between healthcare professionals and families of critically ill newborns.

Regula Limacher, Jean-Claude Fauchère, Deborah Gubler, Manya Jerina Hendriks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Impact of palliative care consultation on neonatal end-of-life care utilization.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Uncertainties in the NICU: a scoping review to inform a tailored taxonomy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Grasping the meaning of perinatal palliative care for the multiprofessional team.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Regula LimacherDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jean-Claude FauchèreDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Deborah Gubler *Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. deborah.gubler@kispi.uzh.ch.
Manya Jerina Hendriks *Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation PC 11/18Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation PC 11/18Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences PC 11/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant number of critically ill neonates face potentially adverse prognoses and outcomes, with some of them fulfilling the criteria for perinatal palliative care. When counselling parents about the critical health condition of their child, neonatal healthcare professionals require extensive skills and competencies in palliative care and communication. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the communication patterns and contents between neonatal healthcare professionals and parents of neonates with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions regarding options such as life-sustaining treatment and palliative care in the decision-making process.

methodsA qualitative approach to analysing audio-recorded conversations between neonatal team and parents. Eight critically ill neonates and a total of 16 conversations from two Swiss level III neonatal intensive care units were included.

resultsThree main themes were identified: the weight of uncertainty in diagnosis and prognosis, the decision-making process, and palliative care. Uncertainty was observed to impede the discussion about all options of care, including palliative care. Regarding decision-making, neonatologists oftentimes conveyed to parents that this was a shared endeavour. However, parental preferences were not ascertained in the conversations analysed. In most cases, healthcare professionals were leading the discussion and parents expressed their opinion reactively to the information or options received. Only few couples proactively participated in decision-making. The continuation of therapy was often the preferred course of action of the healthcare team and the option of palliative care was not mentioned. However, once the option for palliative care was raised, the parents' wishes and needs regarding the end-of-life care of their child were obtained, respected, and implemented by the team.

conclusionAlthough shared decision-making was a familiar concept in Swiss neonatal intensive care units, parental involvement in the decision-making process illustrated a somewhat different and complex picture. Strict adherence to the concept of certainty might impede the process of decision-making, thereby not discussing palliation and missing opportunities to include parental values and preferences.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDecision MakingChildCommunicationDeathDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParentsPregnancyProbabilityQualitative ResearchUncertaintyCommunicationDecision-makingEnd-of-lifeNeonatologyPalliative careUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID37138282
PMCPMC10155355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.