Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138222›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2023

Use of C-reactive protein to guide the antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Raphael Figuiredo Dias, Ana Clara Rivetti Bitencourt de Paula, Ursula Gramiscelli Hasparyk, Marcos de Oliveira Rabelo Bassalo Coutinho, João Rafael Assis Alderete, Júlia Chihondo Kanjongo, Renata Aguiar Menezes Silva, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva, Vandack Nobre

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Maternal, neonatal, and nutritional risk factors for medical and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. When to Stop Antibiotics in the Critically Ill?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raphael Figuiredo Dias *Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ana Clara Rivetti Bitencourt de Paula *School of Medicine, Faculdade de Saúde E Ecologia Humana (FASEH), Vespasiano, MG, Brazil.
Ursula Gramiscelli HasparykLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marcos de Oliveira Rabelo Bassalo CoutinhoSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
João Rafael Assis AldereteLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Júlia Chihondo KanjongoSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Renata Aguiar Menezes SilvaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães *Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Investigação Em Medicina Intensiva (NIIMI), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Simões E Silva *Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Vandack Nobre *Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Investigação Em Medicina Intensiva (NIIMI), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. vandack@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302153/2019-5Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311759/2020-3Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 002345/2019Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais CDS-APQ-02541-17Secretaria de Educação Superior do Ministério da Educação Grant 04/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundC-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory protein used in clinical practice to identify and monitor inflammatory and infectious processes. Recent data suggest CRP might be useful in guiding antibiotic therapy discontinuation among critical care patients. This meta-analysis analyzed the benefits and risks of CRP-guided protocols to guide antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients in comparison with standard treatment.

methodsStudies were searched in four databases: CENTRAL, Medline, Embase and LILACS. The search was performed until Jan 25th, 2023. The reference lists of the articles retrieved and related review studies were hand-screened to find eligible trials that might have been missed. Primary endpoints included the duration of antibiotic therapy for the index episode of infection. The secondary endpoint was the all-cause hospital mortality and infection relapses. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Random effects were used to pool the mean differences and odds ratio of individual studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021259977).

resultsThe search strategy retrieved 5209 titles, out of which three studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. 727 adult patients were analyzed, of whom 278 were included in the intervention group and 449 were included in the control group. 55,7% of all patients were women. Meta-analysis indicated that experimental groups (CRP-guided) had a lower duration of antibiotic therapy (days) [MMD = -1.82, 95%IC -3.23; -0.40]; with no difference in mortality [OR = 1.19 95%IC 0.67-2.12] or in the occurrence of infection relapse [OR = 3.21 95%IC 0.85-12.05].

conclusionThe use of CRP-guided protocol reduces the total amount of time required for antibiotic therapy when compared to standard protocols of treatment in hospitalized patients with acute bacterial infection. We did not observe statistical differences regarding mortality and infection relapse rates.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsC-Reactive ProteinAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinAdultAnti-bacterial agentsCirculating biomarkersC-reactive protein (CRP)Duration of therapy

Identifiers

PMID37138222
PMCPMC10155296
OpenAlexW4368356876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.