Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138203›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Urinary tract infection after radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy on the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Jihye Hyun, Moon Soo Ha, Seung Young Oh, Jong Hyun Tae, Byung Hoon Chi, In Ho Chang, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Soon Chul Myung, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Jung Hoon Kim and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jihye Hyun *Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06974, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Moon Soo Ha *Department of Urology, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 21 Bonghyeon-ro, Gyeonggi-Do, 12013, Namyangju-si, Republic of Korea.
Seung Young OhDepartment of Urology, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 21 Bonghyeon-ro, Gyeonggi-Do, 12013, Namyangju-si, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hyun TaeDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Hoon ChiDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In Ho ChangDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hyoung KimDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soon Chul MyungDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tuan Thanh NguyenDepartment of Urology, Cho Ray Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jung Hoon KimDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-ro, Gyeonggi-Do, 14353, Gwangmyeong-si, Republic of Korea.
Jin Wook KimDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-ro, Gyeonggi-Do, 14353, Gwangmyeong-si, Republic of Korea.
Yong Seong LeeDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-ro, Gyeonggi-Do, 14353, Gwangmyeong-si, Republic of Korea.
Jooyoung Lee *Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06974, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jooylee@cau.ac.kr.
Se Young Choi *Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea. urosyc@cau.ac.kr.
Chung-Ang University Hospital · KRChung-Ang University · KRCho Ray Hospital · VN

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1A2C2008207National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1C1C1011806National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1F1A1076502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to assess the trends in urinary tract infections (UTIs) and prognosis of patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT) as definitive treatment options.

methodsThe data of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2007 and 2016 were collected from the National Health Insurance Service database. The incidence of UTIs was evaluated in patients treated with RT, open/laparoscopic RP, and robot-assisted RP. The proportional hazard assumption test was performed using the scaled Schoenfeld residuals based on a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed to assess survival.

resultsA total of 28,887 patients were treated with definitive treatment. In the acute phase (< 3 months), UTIs were more frequent in RP than in RT; in the chronic phase (> 12 months), UTIs were more frequent in RT than in RP. In the early follow-up period, the risk of UTIs was higher in the open/laparoscopic RP group (aHR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.44-1.83; p < 0.001) and the robot-assisted RP group (aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.43; p < 0.001), compared to the RT group. The robot-assisted RP group had a lower risk of UTIs than the open/laparoscopic RP group in the early (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.77-0.78; p < 0.001) and late (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.91; p < 0.001) follow-up periods. In patients with UTI, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, primary treatment, age at UTI diagnosis, type of UTI, hospitalization, and sepsis from UTI were risk factors for overall survival.

conclusionsIn patients treated with RP or RT, the incidence of UTIs was higher than that in the general population. RP posed a higher risk of UTIs than RT did in early follow-up period. Robot-assisted RP had a lower risk of UTIs than open/laparoscopic RP group in total period. UTI characteristics might be related to poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary Tract InfectionsHumansMalePrognosisProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesMortalityPrognosisRadiation therapyRadical prostatectomyRisk factorUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID37138203
PMCPMC10157974
OpenAlexW4367857073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.