Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138198›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1-4 vs. 5-10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16-12).

Jae Sik Kim, Kyubo Kim, Wonguen Jung, Kyung Hwan Shin, Seock-Ah Im, Hee-Jun Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jee Suk Chang, Jee Hyun Kim, Doo Ho Choi and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Jae Sik Kim *Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyubo Kim *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Wonguen JungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Hwan ShinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seock-Ah ImDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hee-Jun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong Bae KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jee Suk ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jee Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Doo Ho ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon Hee ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Yong KimProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Hyun KimProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Ock ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Sea-Won LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Suzy KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jeanny KwonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Ki Mun KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea.
Woong-Ki ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Kyung Su KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Won Sup YoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan-Si, Korea.
Jin Hee KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jihye ChaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju-Si, Korea.
Yoon Kyeong OhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chosun University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
In Ah KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. inah228@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-5399
Seoul National University · KREwha Womans University · KRYonsei University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRChangwon National University · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRChosun University · KRChung-Ang University · KRChungnam National University · KRKorea University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSt. Mary's Hospital · USThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

Korean Ministry of Science and Information & Communication Technology NRF#2023R1A2C3003782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to compare the initial and salvage brain-directed treatment and overall survival (OS) between patients with 1-4 brain metastases (BMs) and those with 5-10 from breast cancer (BC). We also organized a decision tree to select the initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for these patients.

methodsBetween 2008 and 2014, 471 patients were diagnosed with 1-10 BMs. They were divided into two groups based on the number of BM: 1-4 BMs (n = 337) and 5-10 BMs (n = 134). Median follow-up duration was 14.0 months.

resultsStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was the most common treatment modality (n = 120, 36%) in the 1-4 BMs group. In contrast, 80% (n = 107) of patients with 5-10 BMs were treated with WBRT. The median OS of the entire cohort, 1-4 BMs, and 5-10 BMs was 18.0, 20.9, and 13.9 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the number of BM and WBRT were not associated with OS, whereas triple-negative BC and extracranial metastasis decreased OS. Physicians determined the initial WBRT based on four variables in the following order: number and location of BM, primary tumor control, and performance status. Salvage brain-directed treatment (n = 184), mainly SRS/FSRT (n = 109, 59%), prolonged OS by a median of 14.3 months.

conclusionThe initial brain-directed treatment differed notably according to the number of BM, which was chosen based on four clinical factors. In patients with ≤ 10 BMs, the number of BM and WBRT did not affect OS. The major salvage brain-directed treatment modality was SRS/FSRT and increased OS.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryBrainCranial IrradiationFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeBrain metastasisBreast cancerOverall survivalSalvage treatmentWhole-brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37138198
OpenAlexW4367849391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.