Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37138156›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023

Diagnostic test accuracy for cessation of circulation during death determination: a systematic review.

Jennifer A Klowak, Anna-Lisa V Nguyen, Abdullah Malik, Laura Hornby, Christopher J Doig, Joann Kawchuk, Mypinder Sekhon, Sonny Dhanani

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Answering global challenges to the determination of death: consensus-building leadership from Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A KlowakDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Anna-Lisa V NguyenFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abdullah MalikTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laura HornbyCanadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christopher J DoigDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Joann KawchukDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Mypinder SekhonDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sonny DhananiDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada. sdhanani@cheo.on.ca.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CACanadian Blood Services · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo synthesize the available evidence comparing noninvasive methods of measuring the cessation of circulation in patients who are potential organ donors undergoing death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) with the current accepted standard of invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) monitoring. SOURCE: We searched (from inception until 27 April 2021) MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We screened citations and manuscripts independently and in duplicate for eligible studies that compared noninvasive methodologies assessing circulation in patients who were monitored around a period of cessation of circulation. We performed risk of bias assessment, data abstraction, and quality assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation in duplicate and independently. We presented findings narratively. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe included 21 eligible studies (N = 1,177 patients). Meta-analysis was not possible because of study heterogeneity. We identified low quality evidence from four indirect studies (n = 89) showing pulse palpation is less sensitive and specific than IAP (reported sensitivity range, 0.76-0.90; specificity, 0.41-0.79). Isoelectric electrocardiogram (ECG) had excellent specificity for death (two studies; 0% [0/510]), but likely increases the average time to death determination (moderate quality evidence). We are uncertain whether point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) pulse check, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), or POCUS cardiac motion assessment are accurate tests for the determination of circulatory cessation (very low-quality evidence).

conclusionThere is insufficient evidence that ECG, POCUS pulse check, cerebral NIRS, or POCUS cardiac motion assessment are superior or equivalent to IAP for DCC in the setting of organ donation. Isoelectric ECG is specific but can increase the time needed to determine death. Point-of-care ultrasound techniques are emerging therapies with promising initial data but are limited by indirectness and imprecision. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021258936); first submitted 16 June 2021.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansUltrasonographycirculationdeathinvasive arterial blood pressure monitoringorgan donationperfusion

Identifiers

PMID37138156
PMCPMC10202983
OpenAlexW4367856120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.