ArticleCell and tissue banking2024
Advantages and challenges in processing and quality control of decellularized heart valves.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in pericardium extracellular matrix for tissue regeneration, along with a short insight into artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 1000 donated aortic and pulmonary valves from predominantly European tissue banks were centrally decellularized and delivered to hospitals in Europe and Japan. Here, we report on the processing and quality controls before, during and after the decellularization of these allografts. Our experiences show that all tissue establishments, which provide native cardiovascular allografts for decellularization, meet comparably high-quality standards, regardless of their national origin. A total of 84% of all received allografts could be released as cell-free allografts. By far the most frequent reasons for rejection were non-release of the donor by the tissue establishment or severe contaminations of the native tissue donation. Only in 2% of all cases the specification for freedom from cells was not fulfilled, indicating that decellularization of human heart valves is a safe process with a very low discard ratio. In clinical use, cell-free cardiovascular allografts have been shown to be advantageous over conventional heart valve replacements, at least in young adults. These results open the discussion on the future gold standard and funding of this innovative therapeutic option for heart valve replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.