ArticleNature2023
Is the world ready for ChatGPT therapists?
Article in Nature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are we all singing from the same song sheet? Standardizing terminology used in inter-professional telehealth education and practice: a mixed method study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Comparing Ophthalmologist and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Keeping an AI on the mental health of vulnerable populations: reflections on the potential for participatory injustice.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- Based on Medicine, The Now and Future of Large Language Models.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024Review
- Exploring ChatGPT's potential in the clinical stream of neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- ChatGPT in ophthalmology: the dawn of a new era?Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- A descriptive study based on the comparison of ChatGPT and evidence-based neurosurgeons.iScience · 2023Article
- Overview of Chatbots with special emphasis on artificial intelligence-enabled ChatGPT in medical science.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37138114What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.