ArticleScientific reports2023
Heart disease risk factors detection from electronic health records using advanced NLP and deep learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large language models approach clinician performance in ESC cardiovascular risk stratification: a vignette-based benchmark study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Hybrid deep learning framework MedFusionNet assists multilabel biomedical risk stratification from imaging and tabular data.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging free-text clinical records for heart disease classification through structured feature mapping.PloS one · 2026Article
- Multicriteria Optimization of Language Models for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Symptom Detection in Spanish Electronic Health Records: Comparative Modeling Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Clinical and research applications of natural language processing for heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Applications and Prospects of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiovascular Nursing: Smart Devices, Remote Monitoring, and Personalized Care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Multi-Modal Fusion of Routine Care Electronic Health Records (EHR): A Scoping Review.Information (Basel) · 2025Article
- Social Phenotyping for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Electronic Health Registries.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Comparative Analysis of Mitochondria Surrounding the Intercalated Discs in Heart Diseases-An Ultrastructural Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Using the Electronic Health Record to Develop a Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction Model.Gastro hep advances · 2024Article
- Big Data, Big Insights: Leveraging Data Analytics to Unravel Cardiovascular Exposome Complexities.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- The Utility of Language Models in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Benefits and Concerns of ChatGPT-4.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Development of digital health management systems in longitudinal study: The Malaysian cohort experience.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease remains the major cause of death, despite recent improvements in prediction and prevention. Risk factor identification is the main step in diagnosing and preventing heart disease. Automatically detecting risk factors for heart disease in clinical notes can help with disease progression modeling and clinical decision-making. Many studies have attempted to detect risk factors for heart disease, but none have identified all risk factors. These studies have proposed hybrid systems that combine knowledge-driven and data-driven techniques, based on dictionaries, rules, and machine learning methods that require significant human effort. The National Center for Informatics for Integrating Biology and Beyond (i2b2) proposed a clinical natural language processing (NLP) challenge in 2014, with a track (track2) focused on detecting risk factors for heart disease risk factors in clinical notes over time. Clinical narratives provide a wealth of information that can be extracted using NLP and Deep Learning techniques. The objective of this paper is to improve on previous work in this area as part of the 2014 i2b2 challenge by identifying tags and attributes relevant to disease diagnosis, risk factors, and medications by providing advanced techniques of using stacked word embeddings. The i2b2 heart disease risk factors challenge dataset has shown significant improvement by using the approach of stacking embeddings, which combines various embeddings. Our model achieved an F1 score of 93.66% by using BERT and character embeddings (CHARACTER-BERT Embedding) stacking. The proposed model has significant results compared to all other models and systems that we developed for the 2014 i2b2 challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.