Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137995›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation.

Justin T Lui, Valerie Dahm, Joseph M Chen, Vincent Y Lin, Jonathan C Irish, Trung N Le, Harley H L Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin T LuiSection of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Valerie DahmDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Joseph M ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Vincent Y LinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jonathan C IrishDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Trung N LeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Harley H L ChanGuided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. Harley.Chan@rmp.uhn.ca.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of augmented reality (AR) guided surgery on accuracy, duration, and ease on bone conduction implantation. Five surgeons surgically implanted two different types of conduction implants on cadaveric specimens with and without AR projection. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography scans were superimposed to calculate centre-to-centre distances and angular accuracies. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used to compare centre-to-centre (C-C) and angular accuracies between the control and experimental arms. Additionally, projection accuracy was derived from the distance between the bony fiducials and the projected fiducials using image guidance coordinates. Both operative time (4.3 ± 1.2 min. vs. 6.6 ± 3.5 min., p = 0.030) and centre-to-centre distances surgery (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.0 ± 5.3 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly less in augmented reality guided surgery. The difference in angular accuracy, however, was not significantly different. The overall average distance between the bony fiducial markings and the AR projected fiducials was 1.7 ± 0.6 mm. With direct intraoperative reference, AR-guided surgery enhances bone conduction implant placement while reduces operative time when compared to conventional surgical planning.

Indexed as

Augmented RealitySurgery, Computer-AssistedBone ConductionFiducial MarkersHumansImaging, Three-Dimensional

Identifiers

PMID37137995
PMCPMC10156678
OpenAlexW4367843746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.