ArticleScientific reports2023
A 6-year nationwide population-based study on the current status of gastric endoscopic resection in Korea using administrative data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastric Mucosa Cancer Risk: The Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment Staging System.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- The Impact of Institutional Volume of Endoscopic Resection on Early-Stage Gastric Cancer Outcomes.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea: Results From the Korean College ofJournal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea: Results From the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research (KCHUGR) 2023 Survey.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Challenges, innovations, and the road ahead.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Analysis of risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with an emphasis on age and sex differences: A nationwide population-based study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- National Statistics of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric endoscopic resection (ER) is widely performed in Korea. This study aimed to investigate the overall status of gastric ER in Korea. We enrolled ESD or EMR cases performed for gastric cancer and adenoma from 2012 to 2017 by searching the NHIS database. The annual trend of gastric ER and the clinical characteristics were investigated. Institutions were classified into very high-, high-, low-, and very low volume centers (VHVC, HVC, LVC, and VLVC) by the procedure numbers, and institutional types, regional distributions, and medical resources were investigated accordingly. There were 175,370 ER cases during the study period, with an increasing trend over time. The average annual ESD procedure numbers were 3.9, 54.5, 249.5, and 540.3 cases in 131 VLVCs, 119 LVCs, 24 HVCs, and 12 VHVCs, respectively. Among ESD-performing institutions, 44.8% were located in the Seoul Capital Area. The distribution of medical resources showed a positive correlation with the procedural volume. Similar tendencies were also demonstrated in EMR, with some differences in hospital types and regional distribution. Gastric ER and ESD are increasing in Korea. There was a significant variance in the number of ER procedures and the distribution of types, regions, and medical resources according to the procedural volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.