ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning based on computational fluid dynamics enables geometric design optimisation of the NeoVAD blades.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary Optimization Design of pVADs Using Analytical Target Cascading-Guided Genetic Algorithm.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Numerical and machine learning based evaluation of ethylene glycol based hybrid nano-structured (TiOScientific reports · 2025Article
- Unsteady CFD simulation of a rotor blade under various wind conditions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Current status and future directions in pediatric ventricular assist device.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Optimization of a centrifugal blood pump designed using an industrial method through experimental and numerical study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The NeoVAD is a proposed paediatric axial-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), small enough to be implanted in infants. The design of the impeller and diffuser blades is important for hydrodynamic performance and haemocompatibility of the pump. This study aimed to optimise the blades for pump efficiency using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), machine learning and global optimisation. Meshing of each design typically included 6 million hexahedral elements and a Shear Stress Transport turbulence model was used to close the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations. CFD models of 32 base geometries, operating at 8 flow rates between 0.5 and 4 L/min, were created to match experimental studies. These were validated by comparison of the pressure-flow and efficiency-flow curves with those experimentally measured for all base prototype pumps. A surrogate model was required to allow the optimisation routine to conduct an efficient search; a multi-linear regression, Gaussian Process Regression and a Bayesian Regularised Artificial Neural Network predicted the optimisation objective at design points not explicitly simulated. A Genetic Algorithm was used to search for an optimal design. The optimised design offered a 5.51% increase in efficiency at design point (a 20.9% performance increase) as compared to the best performing pump from the 32 base designs. An optimisation method for the blade design of LVADs has been shown to work for a single objective function and future work will consider multi-objective optimisation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.