ArticleScientific reports2023
Intracerebral hemorrhage CT scan image segmentation with HarDNet based transformer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing manual and automated methods for extracting perihematomal features in predicting hemorrhage expansion in deep intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adapting foundation models for rapid clinical response: intracerebral hemorrhage segmentation in emergency settings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Strategies to Improve the Robustness and Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification in Neuroimaging.BioMedInformatics · 2025Article
- Transformers for Neuroimage Segmentation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Optimizing Automated Hematoma Expansion Classification from Baseline and Follow-Up Head Computed Tomography.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Hybrid Transformer-Convolutional Neural Network for Segmentation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Perihematomal Edema on Non-Contrast Head Computed Tomography (CT) with Uncertainty Quantification to Improve Confidence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although previous studies conducted on the segmentation of hemorrhage images were based on the U-Net model, which comprises an encoder-decoder architecture, these models exhibit low parameter passing efficiency between the encoder and decoder, large model size, and slow speed. Therefore, to overcome these drawbacks, this study proposes TransHarDNet, an image segmentation model for the diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage in CT scan images of the brain. In this model, the HarDNet block is applied to the U-Net architecture, and the encoder and decoder are connected using a transformer block. As a result, the network complexity was reduced and the inference speed improved while maintaining the high performance compared to conventional models. Furthermore, the superiority of the proposed model was verified by using 82,636 CT scan images showing five different types of hemorrhages to train and test the model. Experimental results showed that the proposed model exhibited a Dice coefficient and IoU of 0.712 and 0.597, respectively, in a test set comprising 1200 images of hemorrhage, indicating better performance compared to typical segmentation models such as U-Net, U-Net++, SegNet, PSPNet, and HarDNet. Moreover, the inference time was 30.78 frames per second (FPS), which was faster than all en-coder-decoder-based models except HarDNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.