ArticleScientific reports2023
Effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.).
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimum seeding rate for biomass sorghum in response to harvesting and planting dates in the Mid-Atlantic Regions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exogenous Glutathione and Nitric Oxide Improve Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Differential responses of onion genotypes in growth, physiological and biochemical traits, and bulb yield under waterlogging stress.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unraveling the genetic mechanisms of waterlogging stress through the leaf metabolome of a sweet corn panel.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- 2-(3,4-Dichlorophenoxy)triethylamine (DCPTA) Sustains Root Activity Through the Enhancement of Ascorbate-Glutathione in Spring Maize (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Teff Yield and Nutrient Uptake Partitioning During Prolonged Waterlogging: A Preliminary Greenhouse Study.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Integrated morphological, physiological, and transcriptomic analyses uncover the mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses reveal key pathway responses during the grain-filling stage in maize under waterlogging stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- EvaluatingFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Elucidating the molecular responses to waterlogging stress in onion (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Editorial: Advances in breeding for waterlogging tolerance in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various plants, including sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), are exposed to waterlogging; however, little is known about the effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on sorghum. A pot experiment was conducted using two sorghum hybrids, Jinuoliang 01 (JN01) and Jinza 31 (JZ31), to investigate the effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on the photosynthesis enzyme activity, chlorophyll content, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, photosynthetic parameters, dry matter accumulation, and grain yield. The experiment was conducted using waterlogging treatments implemented at the five-leaf stage (T1), flowering stage (T2), and filling stage (T3), using standard management (no waterlogging) as a control (CK). The adverse effects of waterlogging on sorghum growth varied with the waterlogging timing, with the maximum impact at T1, followed by T2 and T3. JZ31 was more sensitive to waterlogging compared to JN01. Waterlogged conditions inhibited the photosynthetic enzyme activity and reduced the chlorophyll content and photosynthesis, ultimately lowering the biomass yield and grain yield. The maximum yield loss was observed with the T1 waterlogging treatment; the grain yield of JN01 and JZ31 decreased by 52.01-54.58% and 69.52-71.97%, respectively, compared with CK. Furthermore, the decline in grain yield in T1 was associated with reducing grain number per panicle. These findings indicate that sorghum is sensitive to waterlogging at the five-leaf stage and JZ31 is more sensitive to waterlogging than JN01, which may provide a basis for selecting genotypes and management measures to cope with waterlogging in sorghum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.