ArticleESC heart failure2023
Short-term outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged with Impella 5.5 ventricular assist device.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and Management of Access Site Infection Following Trans-Axillary Implant of a Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- The changing landscape of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in the new heart allocation system: A US nationwide analysis.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures in Patients with Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock Following Axillary Mechanical Circulatory Support.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mortality Predictors in Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Multicentre comparison of various microaxial pump devices as a bridge to durable assist device implantation.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Bridging to orthotopic heart transplant: Reducing the risk of intra-operative blood loss.JHLT open · 2025Article
- High capacity Impella, an effective mechanical support strategy for patients in cardiogenic shock bridged to heart transplantation.REC, interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Mechanical circulatory support as a cornerstone in advanced heart failure and transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Use of Intravascular Micro-Axial Left Ventricular Assist Devices as a Bridging Strategy for Cardiogenic Shock: Mid-Term Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Bridge to Life: Current Landscape of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Heart-Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Short-term outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged with Impella 5.5 ventricular assist device.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe sought to investigate the outcomes of heart transplant patients supported with Impella 5.5 temporary mechanical circulatory support. METHODS AND
resultsPatient demographics, perioperative data, hospital timeline, and haemodynamic parameters were followed during initial admission, Impella support, and post-transplant period. Vasoactive-inotropic score, primary graft failure, and complications were recorded. Between March 2020 and March 2021, 16 advanced heart failure patients underwent Impella 5.5 temporary left ventricular assist device support through axillary approach. Subsequently, all these patients had heart transplantation. All patients were either ambulatory or chair bound during their temporary mechanical circulatory support until heart transplantation. Patients were kept on Impella support median of 19 days (3-31) with the median lactate dehydrogenase level of 220 (149-430). All Impella devices were removed during heart transplantation. During Impella support, patients had improved renal function with median creatinine serum level of 1.55 mg/dL decreased to 1.25 (P = 0.007), pulmonary artery pulsatility index scores increased from 2.56 (0.86-10) to 4.2 (1.3-10) (P = 0.048), and right ventricular function improved (P = 0.003). Patients maintained improved renal function and favourable haemodynamics after their heart transplantation as well. All patients survived without any significant morbidity after their heart transplantation.
conclusionsImpella 5.5 temporary left ventricular assist device optimizes care of heart transplant recipients providing superior haemodynamic support, mobility, improved renal function, pulmonary haemodynamics, and right ventricular function. Utilizing Impella 5.5 as a direct bridging strategy to heart transplantation resulted in excellent outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.