Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137731›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2024

Living with Dementia in Aotearoa (LiDiA): A Feasibility Study for a Dementia Prevalence Study in Māori and Non-Māori Living in New Zealand.

Adrian Martinez-Ruiz, Susan Yates, Gary Cheung, Sarah Cullum, Makarena Dudley, Rita Krishnamurthi, Fuafiva Fa'alau, Ngaire Kerse, Mary Roberts, Seini Taufa and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian Martinez-RuizDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-6674
Susan YatesDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Gary CheungDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sarah CullumDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Makarena DudleySchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rita KrishnamurthiNational Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Fuafiva Fa'alauSchool of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ngaire KerseSchool of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mary RobertsResearch Department, Moana Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Seini TaufaResearch Department, Moana Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Claudia Rivera RodriguezDepartment of Statistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent estimations have projected a threefold increase in dementia prevalence in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) by 2050, particularly in Maori and Pacific peoples. However, to date, there are no national data on dementia prevalence, and overseas data are used to estimate the NZ dementia statistics. The aim of this feasibility study was to prepare the groundwork for the first full-scale NZ dementia prevalence study that is representative of Māori, European, Pacific and Asian peoples living in NZ.

methodsThe main feasibility issues were: (i) Sampling to ensure adequate community representation from the included ethnic groups, (ii) Preparing a workforce to conduct the fieldwork and developing quality control, (iii) Raising awareness of the study in the communities (iv) Maximizing recruitment by door-knocking, (v) Retaining those we have recruited to the study and (vi) Acceptability of study recruitment and assessment using adapted versions of the 10/66 dementia protocol in different ethnic groups living in South Auckland.

resultsWe found that a probability sampling strategy using NZ Census data was reasonably accurate and all ethnic groups were sampled effectively. We demonstrated that we were able to train up a multi-ethnic workforce consisting of lay interviewers who were able to administer the 10/66 dementia protocol in community settings. The response rate (224/297, 75.5%) at the door-knocking stage was good but attrition at subsequent stages was high and only 75/297 (25.2%) received the full interview.

conclusionsOur study showed that it would be feasible to conduct a population-based dementia prevalence study using the 10/66 dementia protocol in Māori, European and Asian communities living in NZ, utilizing a qualified, skilled research team representative of the families participating in the study. The study has demonstrated that for recruitment and interviewing in Pacific communities a different but culturally appropriate approach is required.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesEthnicityFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMaori PeopleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPrevalencedementiadementia prevalencefeasibility studymulti-ethnic dementia prevalencepopulation based study

Identifiers

PMID37137731
PMCPMC11041074
OpenAlexW4367835665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.