Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137702›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2024

Older age is associated with greater misperception of the relative health risk of e-cigarettes and cigarettes among US adults who smoke.

Dana Rubenstein, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, Dana Mowls Carroll, F Joseph McClernon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Tobacco Product Use and Type by Military Veteran Status: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 2021-2023.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dana RubensteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA dana.rubenstein@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-9641
Rachel L Denlinger-ApteSocial Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3182-7188
Jennifer Cornacchione RossDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dana Mowls CarrollDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4334-9515
F Joseph McClernonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USBoston University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002555 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Laying the Foundation for Personalized Smoking Cessation Treatment in the American Indian PopulationK01MD014795 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARROLL, DANA MOWLS · 2020 to 2024
$684k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002555NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD014795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥55 has remained stagnant over the past decade. National data modelling suggests no reduction in cigarette smoking prevalence attributable to e-cigarette use in the USA among people aged ≥45. Misperceptions about the absolute risks (ie, cigarettes are not harmful) and relative risks (ie, e-cigarettes are more harmful than cigarettes) of tobacco products may contribute to sustained smoking prevalence and hesitancy to switch from cigarettes to e-cigarettes among older adults.

methodsParticipants reported cigarette use (n=8072) at Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Weighted multivariable logistic regressions included six age categories (independent variable) and cigarette and e-cigarette risk perceptions (outcomes). Additional models assessed the associations between dichotomous age (≥55 vs 18-54), risk perceptions and an interaction term (independent variables) with past 12-month quit attempts and past-month e-cigarette use (outcomes).

resultsAdults aged ≥65 were less likely than adults aged 18-24 to rate cigarettes as very/extremely harmful (p<0.05). Odds of rating e-cigarettes as more harmful than cigarettes among adults aged 55-64 and ≥65 were 1.71 (p<0.001) and 1.43 (p=0.024) greater than for adults aged 18-24. This misperception was negatively associated with past-month e-cigarette use and was stronger among adults aged ≥55 (p<0.001) than adults aged <55 (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: Adults aged ≥55 are more likely to have misperceptions about the absolute and relative risks of tobacco products, which may contribute to continued smoking. Health communications targeting this age group could modify beliefs about the perceived harms of tobacco products.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCigarette SmokingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPrevalenceSmoking CessationUnited StatesVapingElectronic nicotine delivery devicesHarm ReductionPriority/special populations

Identifiers

PMID37137702
PMCPMC10622327
OpenAlexW4367849563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.