Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137691›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2023

Night work and breast cancer risk in a cohort of female healthcare employees in Stockholm, Sweden.

Per Gustavsson, Carolina Bigert, Tomas Andersson, Manzur Kader, Mikko Härmä, Jenny Selander, Theo Bodin, Maria Albin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Working hours and health - key research topics in the past and future.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Per GustavssonInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden per.gustavsson@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2221-8599
Carolina BigertInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tomas AnderssonInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Manzur KaderInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikko HärmäWork Ability and Working Careers, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4816-8828
Jenny SelanderInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theo BodinInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria AlbinInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNight work has been classified as probably carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, but epidemiological evidence was considered limited due to variability in findings and potential bias. This study aimed to investigate the risk of breast cancer in a cohort with detailed and registry-based data on night work.

methodsThe cohort comprised 25 585 women (nurses and nursing assistants) employed 1 year or more between 2008 and 2016 in the healthcare sector in Stockholm. Information on work schedules was obtained from employment records. Breast cancer cases were identified from the national cancer register. HRs were estimated by a discrete time proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, country of birth, profession and childbirth.

resultsThere were 299 cases of breast cancer, 147 in premenopausal and 152 in postmenopausal women. The adjusted HR of postmenopausal breast cancer in association with ever versus never working nights was 1.31 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.85). Eight or more years of night work was associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, HR=4.33 (95% CI 1.45 to 10.57), based on five cases only, though.

conclusionsThis study is limited by a short period of follow-up and a lack of information on night work before 2008. Most exposure metrics showed no association with breast cancer risk, but there was an elevated risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in women after 8 or more years of night work.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansRisk FactorsSwedenWork Schedule ToleranceCancerEpidemiologyHealth PersonnelOccupational HealthShift Work Schedule

Identifiers

PMID37137691
PMCPMC10313944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.