ArticleBMJ open2023
Clinical features and novel technologies for prehospital detection of intracerebral haemorrhage: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe detection of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in the prehospital setting without conventional imaging technology might allow early treatment to reduce haematoma expansion and improve patient outcomes. Although ICH and ischaemic stroke share many clinical features, some may help in distinguishing ICH from other suspected stroke patients. In combination with clinical features, novel technologies may improve diagnosis further. This scoping review aims to first identify the early, distinguishing clinical features of ICH and then identify novel portable technologies that may enhance differentiation of ICH from other suspected strokes. Where appropriate and feasible, meta-analyses will be performed.
methodsThe scoping review will follow the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology for Scoping Reviews as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A systematic search will be conducted using MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and CENTRAL (Ovid). EndNote reference management software will be used to remove duplicate entries. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text reports according to prespecified eligibility criteria using the Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute software. One reviewer will screen all titles, abstracts and full-text reports of potentially eligible studies, while the other reviewer will independently screen at least 20% of all titles, abstracts and full-text reports. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Results will be tabulated in accordance with the scoping review's objectives along with a narrative discussion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review, as it will only include published literature. The results will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal, presented at scientific conferences and form part of a PhD thesis. We expect the findings to contribute to future research into the early detection of ICH in suspected stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.