Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137538›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Descriptive assessment of COVID-19 responses and lessons learnt in Cambodia, January 2020 to June 2022.

Srean Chhim, Grace Ku, Sovathiro Mao, Willem Van De Put, Wim Van Damme, Por Ir, Chhorvann Chhea, Vandine Or

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Srean ChhimTechnical Office, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia srean168@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1558-1875
Grace KuDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4276-9104
Sovathiro MaoTechnical Office, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Willem Van De PutDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3306-5287
Wim Van DammeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-3007
Por IrManagement team, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chhorvann ChheaManagement team, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0001-6997-2535
Vandine OrManagement team, Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a member state of the International Health Regulations 2005, Cambodia is continuously strengthening its capacity to respond to health emergencies and prevent the international spread of diseases. Despite this, Cambodia's capacity to prevent, detect and rapidly respond to public health threats remained limited at the onset of the pandemic, as was the case in most countries. This paper describes epidemiological phases, response phases, strategy and lessons learnt in Cambodia between 27 January 2020 and 30 June 2022. We classified epidemiological phases in Cambodia into three phases, in which Cambodia responded using eight measures: (1) detect, isolate/quarantine; (2) face coverings, hand hygiene and physical distancing measures; (3) risk communication and community engagement; (4) school closures; (5) border closures; (6) public event and gathering cancellation; (7) vaccination; and (8) lockdown. The measures corresponded to six strategies: (1) setting up and managing a new response system, (2) containing the spread with early response, (3) strengthening the identification of cases and contacts, (4) strengthening care for patients with COVID-19, (5) boosting vaccination coverage and (6) supporting disadvantaged groups. Thirteen lessons were learnt for future health emergency responses. Findings suggest that Cambodia successfully contained the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the first year and quickly attained high vaccine coverage by the second year of the response. The core of this success was the strong political will and high level of cooperation from the public. However, Cambodia needs to further improve its infrastructure for quarantining and isolating cases and close contacts and laboratory capacity for future health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19CambodiaCommunicable Disease ControlEmergenciesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19epidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID37137538
PMCPMC10163327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.