Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137535›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Why understanding food choice is crucial to transform food systems for human and planetary health.

Krystal K Rampalli, Christine E Blake, Edward A Frongillo, Joseph Montoya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Foraging, Farming or Shopping? A Decision Matrix Approach for Food Environment Assessments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Climate change and liver disease: a mini review.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krystal K RampalliDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA rampalli@email.sc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8493-5556
Christine E BlakeDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0121-6837
Edward A FrongilloDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-9815
Joseph MontoyaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
University of South Carolina · USSouth Carolina Department of Education · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What, how and why people eat has long been understood to be important for human health, but until recently, has not been recognised as an essential facet of climate change and its effects on planetary health. The global climate change and diet-related health crises occurring are connected to food systems, food environments and consumer food choices. Calls to transform food systems for human and planetary health highlight the importance of understanding individual food choice. Understanding what, how and why people eat the way they do is crucial to successful food systems transformations that achieve both human and planetary health goals. Little is known about how food choice relates to climate. To clarify potential paths for action, we propose that individual food choice relates to climate change through three key mechanisms. First, the sum of individual food choices influences the supply and demand of foods produced and sold in the marketplace. Second, individual food decisions affect type and quantity of food waste at the retail and household level. Third, individual food choices serve as a symbolic expression of concern for human and planetary health, which can individually and collectively stimulate social movements and behaviour change. To meet the dietary needs of the 2050 global population projection of 10 billion, food systems must transform. Understanding what, how and why people eat the way they do, as well as the mechanisms by which these choices affect climate change, is essential for designing actions conducive to the protection of both human and planetary health.

Indexed as

FoodRefuse DisposalDietFamily CharacteristicsHumansenvironmental healthhealth education and promotionnutritionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37137535
PMCPMC10163507
OpenAlexW4368359719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.