Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37137532›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Factors that influence the uptake of postnatal care from the perspective of fathers, partners and other family members: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Kenneth Finlayson, Emma Sacks, Vanessa Brizuela, Nicola Crossland, Sarah Cordey, Daniela Ziegler, Etienne V Langlois, Dena Javadi, Liz Comrie-Thomson, Soo Downe and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kenneth FinlaysonSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK kwfinlayson1@uclan.ac.uk.
Emma SacksDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-7208
Vanessa BrizuelaDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-0828
Nicola CrosslandSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Sarah CordeySchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Daniela ZieglerDirection de l'enseignement et l'Académie CHUM | Bibliothèque du CHUM, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Etienne V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4853-2511
Dena JavadiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Liz Comrie-ThomsonGlobal Women's and Newborn's Health Group, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Soo DowneSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Mercedes BonetDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostnatal care (PNC) is a key component of maternity provision and presents opportunities for healthcare providers to optimise the health and well-being of women and newborns. However, PNC is often undervalued by parents, family members and healthcare providers. As part of a larger qualitative review exploring the factors that influence PNC uptake by relevant stakeholders, we examined a subset of studies highlighting the views of fathers, partners and family members of postpartum women.

methodsWe undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis using a framework synthesis approach. We searched multiple databases and included studies with extractable qualitative data focusing on PNC utilisation. We identified and labelled a subset of articles reflecting the views of fathers, partners and other family members. Data abstraction and quality assessment were carried out using a bespoke data extraction form and established quality assessment tools. The framework was developed

resultsOf 12 678 papers identified from the original search, 109 were tagged as 'family members views' and, of these, 30 were eligible for this review. Twenty-nine incorporated fathers' views, 7 included the views of grandmothers or mothers-in-law, 4 incorporated other family member views and 1 included comothers. Four themes emerged: access and availability; adapting to fatherhood; sociocultural influences and experiences of care. These findings highlight the significant role played by fathers and family members on the uptake of PNC by women as well as the distinct concerns and needs of fathers during the early postnatal period.

conclusionTo optimise access to postnatal care, health providers should adopt a more inclusive approach incorporating flexible contact opportunities, the availability of more 'family-friendly' information and access to psychosocial support services for both parents.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPostnatal CareFathersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyMaternal healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37137532
PMCPMC10163465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.