Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37134194›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial.

Etan Orgel, Kristin R Knight, Yueh-Yun Chi, Jemily Malvar, Teresa Rushing, Victoria Mena, Laurie S Eisenberg, Shahrad R Rassekh, Colin J D Ross, Erika N Scott and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. N-acetylcysteine for the Prevention of Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Therapeutic Potential of MgHNeuroscience bulletin · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ferroptosis and hearing loss: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic interventions.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Development and Validation of a Novel Prediction Model for Hearing Loss From Cisplatin Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Etan OrgelCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-6818
Kristin R KnightDepartment of Pediatric Audiology, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-5701-3537
Yueh-Yun ChiCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-5684
Jemily MalvarCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5481-6780
Teresa RushingCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3655-7957
Victoria MenaDepartment of Rehabilitation Services-Pediatric Audiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0009-0006-3996-2284
Laurie S EisenbergCaruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0009-0000-0568-4462
Shahrad R RassekhBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8005-2641
Colin J D RossFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1476-7037
Erika N ScottBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4660-7206
Michael NeelyDepartment of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1675-8276
Edward A NeuweltDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-6203
Leslie L MuldoonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-5583-2304
David R FreyerCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-990X
University of Southern California · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAOregon Health & Science University · USDoernbecher Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000130 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$36.0M
Prevention of Cisplatin-induced Hearing Loss in Children with CancerK23DC014291 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI ORGEL, ETAN · 2016 to 2021
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000130NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC014291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is common and permanent. As compared with earlier otoprotectants, we hypothesized N-acetylcysteine (NAC) offers potential for stronger otoprotection through stimulation of glutathione (GSH) production. This study tested the optimal dose, safety, and efficacy of NAC to prevent CIHL. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this nonrandomized, controlled phase Ia/Ib trial, children and adolescents newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic, cisplatin-treated tumors received NAC intravenously 4 hours post-cisplatin. The trial performed dose-escalation across three dose levels to establish a safe dose that exceeded the targeted peak serum NAC concentration of 1.5 mmol/L (as identified from preclinical models). Patients with metastatic disease or who were otherwise ineligible were enrolled in an observation-only/control arm. To evaluate efficacy, serial age-appropriate audiology assessments were performed. Integrated biology examined genes involved in GSH metabolism and post-NAC GSH concentrations.

resultsOf 52 patients enrolled, 24 received NAC and 28 were in the control arm. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; analysis of peak NAC concentration identified 450 mg/kg as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Infusion-related reactions were common. No severe adverse events occurred. Compared with the control arm, NAC decreased likelihood of CIHL at the end of cisplatin therapy [OR, 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.021-0.847; P = 0.033] and recommendations for hearing intervention at end of study (OR, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.011-0.60; P = 0.014). NAC increased GSH; GSTP1 influenced risk for CIHL and NAC otoprotection.

conclusionsNAC was safe at the RP2D, with strong evidence for efficacy to prevent CIHL, warranting further development as a next-generation otoprotectant.

Indexed as

Hearing LossNeoplasmsAcetylcysteineAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentChildCisplatinHumansAcetylcysteineCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID37134194
PMCPMC10330342
OpenAlexW4367840089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.