Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37134169›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Density declines, richness increases, and composition shifts in stream macroinvertebrates.

Samantha L Rumschlag, Michael B Mahon, Devin K Jones, William Battaglin, Jonny Behrens, Emily S Bernhardt, Paul Bradley, Ethan Brown, Frederik De Laender, Ryan Hill and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Keystone communities can rescue aquatic metacommunities influenced by pesticide contamination.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: what are the prospects?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Samantha L RumschlagDepartment of Biological Sciences, Environmental Change Initiative, and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3125-8402
Michael B MahonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Environmental Change Initiative, and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9436-2998
Devin K JonesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Environmental Change Initiative, and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7569-0283
William BattaglinColorado Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7287-7096
Jonny BehrensDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-7139
Emily S BernhardtDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-621X
Paul BradleySouth Atlantic Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7522-8606
Ethan BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, Environmental Change Initiative, and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-4906
Frederik De LaenderResearch Unit of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Namur Institute of Complex Systems, and Institute of Life, Earth, and the Environment, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-973X
Ryan HillPacific Ecological Systems Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9583-0426
Stefan KunzInstitute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-1865
Sylvia LeeCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3855-7085
Emma RosiCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3476-6368
Ralf SchäferInstitute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-1701
Travis S SchmidtWyoming-Montana Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Helena, MT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-0637
Marie SimoninUniv Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1493-881X
Kelly SmallingNew Jersey Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-4920
Kristofor VossDepartment of Biology, Regis University, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-619X
Jason R RohrDepartment of Biological Sciences, Environmental Change Initiative, and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8285-4912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Documenting trends of stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity is challenging because biomonitoring often has limited spatial, temporal, and taxonomic scopes. We analyzed biodiversity and composition of assemblages of >500 genera, spanning 27 years, and 6131 stream sites across forested, grassland, urban, and agricultural land uses throughout the United States. In this dataset, macroinvertebrate density declined by 11% and richness increased by 12.2%, and insect density and richness declined by 23.3 and 6.8%, respectively, over 27 years. In addition, differences in richness and composition between urban and agricultural versus forested and grassland streams have increased over time. Urban and agricultural streams lost the few disturbance-sensitive taxa they once had and gained disturbance-tolerant taxa. These results suggest that current efforts to protect and restore streams are not sufficient to mitigate anthropogenic effects.

Indexed as

EcosystemInvertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityEnvironmental MonitoringForestsRivers

Identifiers

PMID37134169
PMCPMC10156106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.