Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37134091›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Algorithmic voice transformations reveal the phonological basis of language-familiarity effects in cross-cultural emotion judgments.

Tomoya Nakai, Laura Rachman, Pablo Arias Sarah, Kazuo Okanoya, Jean-Julien Aucouturier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomoya NakaiLyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), (INSERM/CNRS/University of Lyon), Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-0894
Laura RachmanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pablo Arias SarahLund University Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kazuo OkanoyaThe University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Jean-Julien AucouturierSciences et Technologies de la Musique et du Son (IRCAM/CNRS/Sorbonne Université), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4477-4812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People have a well-described advantage in identifying individuals and emotions in their own culture, a phenomenon also known as the other-race and language-familiarity effect. However, it is unclear whether native-language advantages arise from genuinely enhanced capacities to extract relevant cues in familiar speech or, more simply, from cultural differences in emotional expressions. Here, to rule out production differences, we use algorithmic voice transformations to create French and Japanese stimulus pairs that differed by exactly the same acoustical characteristics. In two cross-cultural experiments, participants performed better in their native language when categorizing vocal emotional cues and detecting non-emotional pitch changes. This advantage persisted over three types of stimulus degradation (jabberwocky, shuffled and reversed sentences), which disturbed semantics, syntax, and supra-segmental patterns, respectively. These results provide evidence that production differences are not the sole drivers of the language-familiarity effect in cross-cultural emotion perception. Listeners' unfamiliarity with the phonology of another language, rather than with its syntax or semantics, impairs the detection of pitch prosodic cues and, in turn, the recognition of expressive prosody.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionVoiceCross-Cultural ComparisonEmotionsHumansJudgmentLanguage

Identifiers

PMID37134091
PMCPMC10156011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.