Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37134045›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Sodium content of menu items in New York City chain restaurants following enforcement of the sodium warning icon rule, 2015-2017.

Julia S Sisti, Divya Prasad, Sarah Niederman, Tamar Adjoian Mezzacca, Amaka V Anekwe, Jenifer Clapp, Shannon M Farley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia S SistiBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Divya PrasadBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2310-7161
Sarah NiedermanBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Tamar Adjoian MezzaccaBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Amaka V AnekweBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Jenifer ClappBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Shannon M FarleyBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, New York City (NYC) began enforcing a sodium warning regulation at chain restaurants, requiring placement of an icon next to any menu item containing ≥2,300 mg sodium. As menu labeling may improve menu nutritional composition, we investigated whether sodium content of menu items changed following enforcement of the sodium warning icon. All menu offerings at 10 quick-service (QSR) and 3 full-service (FSR) chain restaurants were photographed in 2015 (baseline) and 2017 (follow-up) and matched to nutritional information from restaurant websites; items were categorized as being available at both baseline and follow-up, or at only one timepoint. Linear and logistic regression models, respectively, assessed changes in calculated mean sodium-per-serving per menu item and the odds of an item containing ≥2,300 mg sodium. At baseline, mean per-serving sodium content was 2,160 mg at FSR and 1,070 mg at QSR, and 40.6% of FSR items and 7.2% of QSR items contained ≥2,300 mg sodium per serving. Sodium content did not differ when comparing all items offered at follow-up to all offered at baseline (21 mg, 95% CI: -60,101), or when comparing new versus discontinued items (17 mg, 95% CI: -154, 187). At follow-up, there was no change in the overall likelihood of items requiring a warning icon (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.97,1.79), or when comparing new versus discontinued items (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.02,4.24) (p = 0.04, not significant following Bonferroni correction for multiple analyses). Our findings that the sodium content of menu items did not change following the sodium warning icon regulation underscore difficulties in reducing sodium levels in restaurants; however, our results may be limited by follow-up data collection occurring less than one year post-enforcement. It may take additional time and similar action from other jurisdictions for restaurants to reduce the sodium content of menu items.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeSodiumFood LabelingNew York CityRestaurantsSodium

Identifiers

PMID37134045
PMCPMC10156010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.