Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133932›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuropsychology2023

A double-blind, sham-controlled, trial of home-administered rhythmic 10-Hz median nerve stimulation for the reduction of tics, and suppression of the urge-to-tic, in individuals with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorder.

Barbara Morera Maiquez, Caitlin Smith, Katherine Dyke, Chia-Ping Chou, Belinda Kasbia, Ciara McCready, Hannah Wright, Jessica K Jackson, Isabel Farr, Erika Badinger and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuropsychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Tourette syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara Morera MaiquezSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Caitlin SmithSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Katherine DykeSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Chia-Ping ChouNeurotherapeutics Ltd, The Ingenuity Centre, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Belinda KasbiaNeurotherapeutics Ltd, The Ingenuity Centre, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Ciara McCreadyNeurotherapeutics Ltd, The Ingenuity Centre, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Hannah WrightNeurotherapeutics Ltd, The Ingenuity Centre, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Jessica K JacksonNeurotherapeutics Ltd, The Ingenuity Centre, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Isabel FarrSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Erika BadingerSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Georgina M JacksonNeurotherapeutics Ltd, The Ingenuity Centre, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Stephen R JacksonSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-4072
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD) are neurological disorders of childhood onset characterized by the occurrence of tics; repetitive, purposeless, movements or vocalizations of short duration which can occur many times throughout a day. Currently, effective treatment for tic disorders is an area of considerable unmet clinical need. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a home-administered neuromodulation treatment for tics involving the delivery of rhythmic pulse trains of median nerve stimulation (MNS) delivered via a wearable 'watch-like' device worn at the wrist. We conducted a UK-wide parallel double-blind sham-controlled trial for the reduction of tics in individuals with tic disorder. The device was programmed to deliver rhythmic (10 Hz) trains of low-intensity (1-19 mA) electrical stimulation to the median nerve for a pre-determined duration each day, and was intended to be used by each participant in their home once each day, 5 days each week, for a period of 4 weeks. Between 18th March 2022 and 26th September 2022, 135 participants (45 per group) were initially allocated, using stratified randomization, to one of the following groups; active stimulation; sham stimulation or to a waitlist (i.e. treatment as usual) control group. Recruited participants were individuals with confirmed or suspected TS/CTD aged 12 years of age or upward with moderate to severe tics. Researchers involved in the collection or processing of measurement outcomes and assessing the outcomes, as well as participants in the active and sham groups and their legal guardians were all blind to the group allocation. The primary outcome measure used to assess the 'offline' or treatment effect of stimulation was the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Severity Score (YGTSS-TTSS) assessed at the conclusion of 4 weeks of stimulation. The primary outcome measure used to assess the 'online' effects of stimulation was tic frequency, measured as the number of tics per minute (TPM) observed, based upon blind analysis of daily video recordings obtained while stimulation was delivered. The results demonstrated that after 4-week stimulation, tic severity (YGTSS-TTSS) had reduced by 7.1 points (35 percentile reduction) for the active stimulation group compared to 2.13/2.11 points for the sham stimulation and waitlist control groups. The reduction in YGTSS-TTSS for the active stimulation group was substantially larger, clinically meaningful (effect size = .5) and statistically significant (p = .02) compared to both the sham stimulation and waitlist control groups, which did not differ from one another (effect size = -.03). Furthermore, blind analyses of video recordings demonstrated that tic frequency (tics per minute) reduced substantially (-15.6 TPM) during active stimulation compared to sham stimulation (-7.7 TPM). This difference represents a statistically significant (p < .03) and clinically meaningful reduction in tic frequency (>25 percentile reduction: effect size = .3). These findings indicate that home-administered rhythmic MNS delivered through a wearable wrist-worn device has the potential to be an effective community-based treatment for tic disorders.

Indexed as

Tic DisordersTicsTourette SyndromeChildHumansMedian NerveSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcomehome-administered stimulationmedian nerve stimulationsham-controlticsTourette syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37133932
PMCPMC10947020
OpenAlexW4367834566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.