ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2023
Progress made in the efficacy and viability of deep-learning-based noise reduction.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Speech-in-Noise Tools for the Assessment of Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Hearing Aids: What Works Well and What Can Be Improved.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Review
- Communication in Complex Situations: The Combined Influence of Dysarthria and Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Speech Perception in Everyday Noisy Environments.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- A brain-inspired algorithm improves "cocktail party" listening for individuals with hearing loss.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- An ideal compressed mask for increasing speech intelligibility without sacrificing environmental sound recognitiona).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Improved tactile speech robustness to background noise with a dual-path recurrent neural network noise-reduction method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Objective Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Algorithm for Hearing Aids Under Diverse Fitting and Listening Conditions.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent years have brought considerable advances to our ability to increase intelligibility through deep-learning-based noise reduction, especially for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. In this study, intelligibility improvements resulting from a current algorithm are assessed. These benefits are compared to those resulting from the initial demonstration of deep-learning-based noise reduction for HI listeners ten years ago in Healy, Yoho, Wang, and Wang [(2013). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 3029-3038]. The stimuli and procedures were broadly similar across studies. However, whereas the initial study involved highly matched training and test conditions, as well as non-causal operation, preventing its ability to operate in the real world, the current attentive recurrent network employed different noise types, talkers, and speech corpora for training versus test, as required for generalization, and it was fully causal, as required for real-time operation. Significant intelligibility benefit was observed in every condition, which averaged 51% points across conditions for HI listeners. Further, benefit was comparable to that obtained in the initial demonstration, despite the considerable additional demands placed on the current algorithm. The retention of large benefit despite the systematic removal of various constraints as required for real-world operation reflects the substantial advances made to deep-learning-based noise reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.