Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133795›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2023

Comparison of demineralized bone matrix with different cycling crushing times in posterolateral fusion model of athymic rats.

Shao-Lin Ji, Xiao-Dan Zhao, Li-Min Wang, Cheng-Gang Pang, Wen-Jing Li, Kun-Xiu Song, Rong-Xing Ma, Rui-Feng Li, Jing-Yu Zhang, Yong-Cheng Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shao-Lin JiTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xiao-Dan ZhaoShandong Provincial Third Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Li-Min WangBeijing wonderful medical biomaterial Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Cheng-Gang PangDepartment of Trauma, Zoucheng People's Hospital, Zoucheng, China.
Wen-Jing LiBeijing wonderful medical biomaterial Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Kun-Xiu SongDepartment of Hand Surgery, BinZhou medical university hospital, Binzhou, China.
Rong-Xing MaTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Rui-Feng LiTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Jing-Yu ZhangDepartment of Bone Tumor and Soft Tissue Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang Southern Road, Tianjin, 300211, China. zhangjingyu2010@163.com.
Yong-Cheng HuDepartment of Bone Tumor and Soft Tissue Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang Southern Road, Tianjin, 300211, China. huycdoctor@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9034-4269
Shandong University · CNTianjin Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University · CNBinzhou University · CNZoucheng People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decalcified bone matrix (DBM) is a widely used alternative material for bone transplantation. In the DBM production process, an effective particle size and the highest utilization rate of raw materials can be achieved only through multiple high-speed circulating comminution. The rat posterolateral lumbar fusion model (PLF) is the most mature small animal model for the initial evaluation of the efficacy of graft materials for bone regeneration and spinal fusion. To evaluate the differences in the in vivo osteogenic effects of DBM pulverization through 1, 5, 9, and 14 high-speed cycles, sixty athymic rats were divided into six groups: single cycling crushing (CC1), 5 cycles of crushing (CC5), 9 cycles of crushing (CC9), 13 cycles of crushing (CC13), autogenous bone graft (ABG) and negative control (NC). Posterolateral lumbar fusion was performed. Six weeks after surgery, the bilateral lumbar fusion of athymic rats was evaluated through manual palpation, X-ray, micro-CT and histological sections. Rank data were tested by the rank-sum test, and nonparametric data were tested by the Kruskal‒Wallis H test. The manual palpation and X-ray results showed that the fusion rate did not significantly differ between the CC1, CC5, CC9, CC13 and ABG groups. However, cavities appeared in CC9 and CC13 on the micro-CT image. The bone mass (BV/TV) of CC1, CC5, CC9 and CC13 was better than that of the ABG group, while almost no osteogenesis was observed in the NC group. Histologically, there was no obvious difference between the four groups except that the CC9 group and CC13 group had more fibrous tissues in the new bone. In conclusion, DMB with different cycling crushing times has no obvious difference in fusion rate of PLF, but it is slightly better than the ABG group.

Indexed as

Bone MatrixSpinal FusionAnimalsBone and BonesBone TransplantationLumbar VertebraeRatsRats, NudeAllogeneic boneAutologous bone graftCycling crushingDemineralized bone matrixRat posterolateral lumbar fusion model

Identifiers

PMID37133795
OpenAlexW4367835287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.