Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133740›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2023

Intensivist physician-to-patient ratios and mortality in the intensive care unit.

Jeremy M Kahn, Jonathan G Yabes, Leigh A Bukowski, Billie S Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeremy M KahnCRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 602B Allan Magee Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. jeremykahn@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-664X
Jonathan G YabesDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Leigh A BukowskiCRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 602B Allan Magee Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Billie S DavisCRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 602B Allan Magee Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

Organizational strategies for improving evidence-uptake in intensive careR35HL144804 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAHN, JEREMY M · 2019 to 2025
$6.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL144804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA high daily census may hinder the ability of physicians to deliver quality care in the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to determine the relationship between intensivist-to-patient ratios and mortality among ICU patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of intensivist-to-patient ratios in 29 ICUs in 10 hospitals in the United States from 2018 to 2020. We used meta-data from progress notes in the electronic health record to determine an intensivist-specific caseload for each ICU day. We then fit a multivariable proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates to estimate the relationship between the daily intensivist-to-patient ratio and ICU mortality at 28 days.

resultsThe final analysis included 51,656 patients, 210,698 patient days, and 248 intensivist physicians. The average caseload per day was 11.8 (standard deviation: 5.7). There was no association between the intensivist-to-patient ratio and mortality (hazard ratio for each additional patient: 0.987, 95% confidence interval: 0.968-1.007, p = 0.2). This relationship persisted when we defined the ratio as caseload over the sample-wide average (hazard ratio: 0.907, 95% confidence interval: 0.763-1.077, p = 0.26) and cumulative days with a caseload over the sample-wide average (hazard ratio: 0.991, 95% confidence interval: 0.966-1.018, p = 0.52). The relationship was not modified by the presence of physicians-in-training, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants (p value for interaction term: 0.14).

conclusionsMortality for ICU patients appears resistant to high intensivist caseloads. These results may not generalize to ICUs organized differently than those in this sample, such as ICUs outside the United States.

Indexed as

Personnel Staffing and SchedulingPhysiciansCritical CareHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesCritical careIntensive care unitsPhysiciansWorkforceWorkload

Identifiers

PMID37133740
PMCPMC10155655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.