Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133717›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2023

Apperceptive and Associative Forms of Phonagnosia.

Guido Gainotti, Davide Quaranta, Simona Luzzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guido GainottiInstitute of Neurology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemell, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. guido.gainotti@unicatt.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-6612
Davide QuarantaNeurology Unit, Department of Science of Elderly, Neuroscience, Head and Neck and Orthopaedics, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simona LuzziDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPronagnosia is a rare acquired or developmental pathological condition that consists of a selective difficulty to recognize familiar people by their voices. It can be distinguished into two different categories: apperceptive phonagnosia, which denotes a purely perceptual form of voice recognition disorder; and associative phonagnosia, in which patients have no perceptual defects, but cannot evaluate if the voice of a known person is or not familiar. The neural substrate of these two forms of voice recognition is still controversial, but it could concern different components of the core temporal voice areas and of extratemporal voice processing areas. This article reviews recent research on the neuropsychological and anatomo-clinical aspects of this condition. RECENT

findingsData obtained in group studies or single case reports of phonagnosic patients suggest that apperceptive phonagnosia might be due to disruption of the core temporal voice areas, bilaterally located in the posterior parts of the superior temporal gyrus, whereas associative phonagnosia might result from impaired access to structures where voice representations are stored, due to a disconnection of these areas from structures of the voice extended system. Although these results must be confirmed by further investigations, they represent an important step toward understanding the nature and neural substrate of apperceptive and associative forms of phonagnosia.

Indexed as

VoiceHumansRecognition, PsychologyTemporal LobeApperceptive and associative phonagnosiaCore TVAsVoice discriminationVoice extended systemVoice familiarity feelings

Identifiers

PMID37133717
PMCPMC10257619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.