Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133705›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

Lesions of the prepuce and penis in rams: A retrospective study.

L Falchi, S Pau, M Ledda, V Melosu, M T Zedda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L FalchiSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. lfalchi@uniss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-8220
S PauSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
M LeddaSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
V MelosuSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
M T ZeddaSection of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
University of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the ovine reproductive management, a thorough breeding soundness evaluation including specific inspection of the male genital tract represents a valuable tool for assessing the reproductive potential of a selected subject and for diagnosing genital disorders. During examination, accurate inspection on penis and prepuce is necessary, since conditions affecting these structures may hamper regular coitus. Records from 1270 males undergoing breeding soundness evaluation (n = 1232) or admitted for genital disorders to the Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (n = 38) of the Department of Veterinary Medicine, were collected, and lesions of penis and prepuce were therefore classified. The data collected revealed that 47/1270 rams examined presented lesions of the penis and prepuce. The most frequent condition was urolithiasis accounting for over 2% of the cases, followed by lack of the urethral process (0.39% incidence), lack of the glans penis and hypospadias (0.23% cases). Moreover, most of the conditions (40%) were observed in animals less than 2 years old, suggesting the importance of a careful breeding soundness evaluation in animals at young age.

Indexed as

PenisUrethraAnimalsMaleReproductionRetrospective StudiesSheepSheep, DomesticBreeding soundness examinationGlans penisOvineUrethral process

Identifiers

PMID37133705
PMCPMC10698119
OpenAlexW4367834633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.