Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133678›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Unsupervised out-of-distribution detection for safer robotically guided retinal microsurgery.

Alain Jungo, Lars Doorenbos, Tommaso Da Col, Maarten Beelen, Martin Zinkernagel, Pablo Márquez-Neila, Raphael Sznitman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative fusion of models and data for robust distance sensing.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alain JungoARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. alain.jungo@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-4653
Lars DoorenbosARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tommaso Da ColPreceyes B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maarten BeelenPreceyes B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Martin ZinkernagelDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Clinical Research, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Pablo Márquez-NeilaARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Raphael SznitmanARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

Eurostars 114442Horizon 2020 GEYEDANCE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA fundamental problem in designing safe machine learning systems is identifying when samples presented to a deployed model differ from those observed at training time. Detecting so-called out-of-distribution (OoD) samples is crucial in safety-critical applications such as robotically guided retinal microsurgery, where distances between the instrument and the retina are derived from sequences of 1D images that are acquired by an instrument-integrated optical coherence tomography (iiOCT) probe.

methodsThis work investigates the feasibility of using an OoD detector to identify when images from the iiOCT probe are inappropriate for subsequent machine learning-based distance estimation. We show how a simple OoD detector based on the Mahalanobis distance can successfully reject corrupted samples coming from real-world ex vivo porcine eyes.

resultsOur results demonstrate that the proposed approach can successfully detect OoD samples and help maintain the performance of the downstream task within reasonable levels. MahaAD outperformed a supervised approach trained on the same kind of corruptions and achieved the best performance in detecting OoD cases from a collection of iiOCT samples with real-world corruptions.

conclusionThe results indicate that detecting corrupted iiOCT data through OoD detection is feasible and does not need prior knowledge of possible corruptions. Consequently, MahaAD could aid in ensuring patient safety during robotically guided microsurgery by preventing deployed prediction models from estimating distances that put the patient at risk.

Indexed as

MicrosurgeryRetinaAnimalsMachine LearningSwineTomography, Optical CoherenceInstrument-integrated OCTMedical roboticsOut-of-distribution detectionRetinal microsurgery

Identifiers

PMID37133678
PMCPMC10285003
OpenAlexW4367834804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.