Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133549›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association

Are equitable physical performance tests perceived to be fair? Understanding officer cadets' perceptions of fitness standards.

Michelle Enxi Deng, Emily Ford, Adelheid A M Nicol, Kalee De France

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A qualitative assessment of perceptions of gender-based stigma among US Marine Corps officers in training.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle Enxi DengMilitary Psychology and Leadership Department, The Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Emily FordMilitary Psychology and Leadership Department, The Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Adelheid A M NicolMilitary Psychology and Leadership Department, The Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Kalee De FranceYale Center for Emotional Intelligence, Yale University, New Haven Connecticut, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, the armed forces in Western countries such as Canada and the United States have accepted women into virtually all military occupations. Despite this, a growing body of research confirms that female service members face prejudiced treatment while conducting their work in these organizations that continue to be predominately masculine and male-dominated. In particular, women attending the Canadian Military Colleges (CMCs) experience gender-related conflicts arising from the dissimilar fitness test standards between male and female cadets. There have been, however, few studies that scrutinize the psychological mechanisms of these tensions. The aim of this study was to unpack the existing biased perceptions against women pertaining to physical fitness through ambivalent sexism, social dominance orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism. Officer and naval cadets (

Indexed as

AttitudeAuthoritarianismCanadaFemaleHumansMalePhysical Functional PerformanceSexismUnited StatesAmbivalent sexismphysical fitnessRWASDOwomen in the military

Identifiers

PMID37133549
PMCPMC10198004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.