Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133497›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Outcomes following oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma resection and bilateral neck dissection with or without contralateral postoperative radiotherapy of the pathologically node-negative neck.

Florian Jansen, Christian Stephan Betz, Matthias Hans Belau, Gesa Matnjani, Till Sebastian Clauditz, Sebastian Dwertmann-Rico, Katharina Stölzel, Nikolaus Möckelmann, Arne Böttcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florian JansenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neuro Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. florianjansen@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-4675
Christian Stephan BetzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neuro Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias Hans BelauInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gesa MatnjaniDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till Sebastian ClauditzInstitue of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian Dwertmann-RicoInstitue of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina StölzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neuro Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Nikolaus Möckelmann *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neuro Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Arne Böttcher *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neuro Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8996-978X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are no consensus guidelines regarding the postoperative treatment of the contralateral pathologically node-negative neck in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. This study aimed to determine if omission of postoperative irradiation of the contralateral pathologically node-negative neck affects oncological outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively identified 84 patients with primary surgical treatment including bilateral neck dissection and postoperative (chemo-)radiotherapy (PO(C)RT). Survival was analyzed using the log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsPatients showed no decrease in tumor-free, cause-specific (CSS), or overall survival (OS) when PO(C)RT of the contralateral pathologically node-negative neck was omitted. Increased OS was found in patients with unilateral PO(C)RT and especially an increased OS and CSS was found in unilateral PO(C)RT and in tumors arising from lymphoepithelial tissue.

conclusionsOmitting the contralateral pathologically node-negative neck appears to be safe in terms of survival and our retrospective study advocates further prospective randomized control de-escalation trials.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsHumansNeck DissectionNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdjuvant treatmentContralateral neckHPVNeck irradiationOropharyngeal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37133497
PMCPMC10313843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.