Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133496›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Lemur Gut Microeukaryotic Community Variation Is Not Associated with Host Phylogeny, Diet, or Habitat.

Mariah E Donohue, Zoe L Hert, Carly E Karrick, Amanda K Rowe, Patricia C Wright, Lovasoa J Randriamanandaza, François Zakamanana, Eva Stela Nomenjanahary, Kathryn M Everson, David W Weisrock

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mariah E Donohue *Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, 101 T.H.M. Building, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA. Mariah.Donohue@uky.edu.
Zoe L Hert *Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, 101 T.H.M. Building, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Carly E Karrick *Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, 101 T.H.M. Building, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Amanda K RoweInterdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Patricia C WrightDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Lovasoa J RandriamanandazaCentre ValBio Research Station, Ranomafana, MD, USA.
François ZakamananaCentre ValBio Research Station, Ranomafana, MD, USA.
Eva Stela NomenjanaharyAnthropobiologie et Développement Durable, Université Antananarivo, Antananarivo, MD, USA.
Kathryn M EversonDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, 101 T.H.M. Building, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
David W WeisrockDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, 101 T.H.M. Building, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the major forces driving variation in gut microbiomes enhances our understanding of how and why symbioses between hosts and microbes evolved. Gut prokaryotic community variation is often closely associated with host evolutionary and ecological variables. Whether these same factors drive variation in other microbial taxa occupying the animal gut remains largely untested. Here, we present a one-to-one comparison of gut prokaryotic (16S rRNA metabarcoding) and microeukaryotic (18S rRNA metabarcoding) community patterning among 12 species of wild lemurs. Lemurs were sampled from dry forests and rainforests of southeastern Madagascar and display a range of phylogenetic and ecological niche diversity. We found that while lemur gut prokaryotic community diversity and composition vary with host taxonomy, diet, and habitat, gut microeukaryotic communities have no detectable association with any of these factors. We conclude that gut microeukaryotic community composition is largely random, while gut prokaryotic communities are conserved among host species. It is likely that a greater proportion of gut microeukaryotic communities comprise taxa with commensal, transient, and/or parasitic symbioses compared with gut prokaryotes, many of which form long-term relationships with the host and perform important biological functions. Our study highlights the importance of greater specificity in microbiome research; the gut microbiome contains many "omes" (e.g., prokaryome, eukaryome), each comprising different microbial taxa shaped by unique selective pressures.

Indexed as

LemurMicrobiotaAnimalsDietPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCommunity ecologyGut microbiomeLemurMadagascarMetabarcodingMicroeukaryotesPhylogenyPhylosymbiosisPrimateProkaryotes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.